...
首页> 外文期刊>Astronomy and astrophysics >Comparison of inversion codes for polarized line formation in MHD simulations - I. Milne-Eddington codes
【24h】

Comparison of inversion codes for polarized line formation in MHD simulations - I. Milne-Eddington codes

机译:MHD模拟中用于极化线形成的反演代码比较-I. Milne-Eddington码

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Milne-Eddington (M-E) inversion codes for the radiative transfer equation are the most widely used tools to infer the magnetic field from observations of the polarization signals in photospheric and chromospheric spectral lines. Unfortunately, a comprehensive comparison between the different M-E codes available to the solar physics community is still missing, and so is a physical interpretation of their inferences. In this contribution we offer a comparison between three of those codes (VFISV, ASP/HAO, and HeLIx+). These codes are used to invert synthetic Stokes profiles that were previously obtained from realistic non-grey three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamical (3D MHD) simulations. The results of the inversion are compared with each other and with those from the MHD simulations. In the first case, the M-E codes retrieve values for the magnetic field strength, inclination and line-of-sight velocity that agree with each other within σB ≤ 35 (Gauss), σγ ≤ 1.2°, and σv ≤ 10 m?s-1, respectively. Additionally, M-E inversion codes agree with the numerical simulations, when compared at a fixed optical depth, within σB ≤ 130 (Gauss), σγ ≤ 5°, and σv ≤ 320 m?s-1. Finally, we show that employing generalized response functions to determine the height at which M-E codes measure physical parameters is more meaningful than comparing at a fixed geometrical height or optical depth. In this case the differences between M-E inferences and the 3D MHD simulations decrease to σB ≤ 90 (Gauss), σγ ≤ 3°, and σv ≤ 90 m?s-1.
机译:用于辐射传递方程的Milne-Eddington(M-E)反演代码是从光球和色球光谱线中的偏振信号观察中推断磁场的最广泛使用的工具。不幸的是,仍然缺少对太阳物理学界可用的不同M-E码之间的全面比较,因此也缺少对其推论的物理解释。在本文中,我们提供了这三个代码(VFISV,ASP / HAO和HeLIx +)之间的比较。这些代码用于反转以前从真实的非灰色三维磁流体动力学(3D MHD)模拟中获得的合成斯托克斯曲线。将反演的结果相互比较,并与MHD模拟的结果进行比较。在第一种情况下,ME代码检索在σB≤35(高斯),σγ≤1.2°和σv≤10 m?s-内彼此一致的磁场强度,倾斜度和视线速度的值。 1,分别。另外,当在固定的光学深度下比较时,M-E反转码与数值模拟一致,在σB≤130(高斯),σγ≤5°和σv≤320 m?s-1范围内。最后,我们表明,使用广义响应函数来确定M-E代码测量物理参数的高度比在固定几何高度或光学深度进行比较更有意义。在这种情况下,M-E推论与3D MHD模拟之间的差异减小为σB≤90(高斯),σγ≤3°和σv≤90 m?s-1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号