...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Microbiology >Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches
【24h】

Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches

机译:传统和替代性粪便污染指标在淡水海滩的分布和差异存活

获取原文
           

摘要

Alternative indicators have been developed that can be used to identify host sources of fecal pollution, yet little is known about how their distribution and fate compare to traditional indicators. Escherichia coli and enterococci were widely distributed at the six beaches studied and were detected in almost 95% of water samples (n = 422) and 100% of sand samples (n = 400). Berm sand contained the largest amount of E. coli (P < 0.01), whereas levels of enterococci were highest in the backshore (P < 0.01). E. coli and enterococci were the lowest in water, using a weight-to-volume comparison. The gull-associated Catellicoccus marimammalium (Gull2) marker was found in over 80% of water samples, regardless of E. coli levels, and in 25% of sand samples. Human-associated Bacteroides (HB) and Lachnospiraceae (Lachno2) were detected in only 2.4% of water samples collected under baseflow and post-rain conditions but produced a robust signal after a combined sewage overflow, despite low E. coli concentrations. Burdens of E. coli and enterococci in water and sand were disproportionately high in relation to alternative indicators when comparing environmental samples to source material. In microcosm studies, Gull2, HB, and Lachno2 quantitative PCR (qPCR) signals were reduced twice as quickly as those from E. coli and enterococci and approximately 20% faster than signals from culturable E. coli. High concentrations of alternative indicators in source material illustrated their high sensitivity for the identification of fecal sources; however, differential survival and the potential for long-term persistence of traditional fecal indicators complicate the use of alternative indicator data to account for the levels of E. coli and enterococci in environmental samples.IMPORTANCEE. coli and enterococci are general indicators of fecal pollution and may persist in beach sand, making their use problematic for many applications. This study demonstrates that gull fecal pollution is widespread at Great Lakes beaches, whereas human and ruminant contamination is evident only after major rain events. An exploration of sand as a reservoir for indicators found that E. coli was ubiquitous, while gull host markers were detected in only 25% of samples. In situ sand beach microcosms provided decay rate constants for E. coli and enterococci relative to alternative indicators, which establish comparative benchmarks that would be helpful to distinguish recent from past pollution. Overall, alternative indicators are useful for identifying sources and assessing potentially high health risk contamination events; however, beach managers should be cautious in attempting to directly link their detection to the levels of E. coli or enterococci.
机译:已经开发出可用于识别粪便污染宿主来源的替代指标,但人们对其分布和命运与传统指标的比较了解甚少。大肠埃希菌和肠球菌广泛分布在所研究的六个海滩上,并在将近95%的水样本(n = 422)和100%的沙子样本(n = 400)中被检测到。砂中的大肠杆菌含量最高(P <0.01),而沿海地区的肠球菌含量最高(P <0.01)。使用重量与体积比较,大肠杆菌和肠球菌含量最低。不论大肠杆菌水平如何,在超过80%的水样品中和25%的沙子样品中都发现了与海鸥相关的卡特氏球菌(Gull2)标记。在底流和雨后条件下,仅2.4%的水样中检出了与人类相关的拟杆菌(HB)和斜纹科(Lachnospiraceae)(Lachno2),尽管大肠杆菌浓度很低,但在污水一起溢出后仍产生了强大的信号。在比较环境样品和原料时,与替代指标相比,水和沙子中大肠杆菌和肠球菌的负担过高。在微观研究中,Gull2,HB和Lachno2定量PCR(qPCR)信号的降低速度是大肠杆菌和肠球菌的两倍,比可培养大肠杆菌的信号快约20%。原料中替代指标的浓度很高,说明它们对粪便来源的识别具有很高的敏感性;但是,传统粪便指标的生存差异和长期持久性的潜力使使用替代指标数据来说明环境样品中大肠杆菌和肠球菌的水平变得更加复杂。大肠杆菌和肠球菌是粪便污染的一般指标,可能会残留在沙滩上,使它们在许多应用中存在问题。这项研究表明,大湖区海滩上的粪便污染很普遍,而人类和反刍动物的污染只有在发生大雨之后才很明显。在用沙子作为指示剂储集层的过程中,发现大肠杆菌无处不在,而仅在25%的样品中检测到了海鸥宿主标记。相对于其他指标,原地沙滩微观世界提供了大肠杆菌和肠球菌的衰减速率常数,这些指标建立了可比较的基准,将有助于区分近期污染与过去污染。总体而言,替代指标可用于识别来源和评估潜在的高度健康风险污染事件;但是,海滩管理员在尝试直接将其检测结果与大肠杆菌或肠球菌水平联系起来时应保持谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号