...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Microbiology >Abilities of the mCP Agar Method and CRENAME Alpha Toxin-Specific Real-Time PCR Assay To Detect Clostridium perfringens Spores in Drinking Water
【24h】

Abilities of the mCP Agar Method and CRENAME Alpha Toxin-Specific Real-Time PCR Assay To Detect Clostridium perfringens Spores in Drinking Water

机译:mCP琼脂法和CRENAMEα毒素特异性实时PCR分析法检测饮用水中产气荚膜梭菌孢子的能力

获取原文
           

摘要

We first determined the analytical specificity and ubiquity (i.e., the ability to detect all or most strains) of a Clostridium perfringens -specific real-time PCR (rtPCR) assay based on the cpa gene ( cpa rtPCR) by using a bacterial strain panel composed of C. perfringens and non- C. perfringens Clostridium strains. All non- C. perfringens Clostridium strains tested negative, whereas all C. perfringens strains tested positive with the cpa rtPCR, for an analytical specificity and ubiquity of 100%. The cpa rtPCR assay was then used to confirm the identity of 116 putative C. perfringens isolates recovered after filtration of water samples and culture on mCP agar. Colonies presenting discordant results between the phenotype on mCP agar and cpa rtPCR were identified by sequencing the 16S rRNA and cpa genes. Four mCP~(?)/rtPCR~(+) colonies were identified as C. perfringens , whereas 3 mCP~(+)/rtPCR~(?) colonies were identified as non- C. perfringens . The cpa rtPCR was negative with all 51 non- C. perfringens strains and positive with 64 of 65 C. perfringens strains. Finally, we compared mCP agar and a CRENAME ( c oncentration and r ecovery of microbial particles, e xtraction of n ucleic a cids, and m olecular e nrichment) procedure plus cpa rtPCR (CRENAME + cpa rtPCR) for their abilities to detect C. perfringens spores in drinking water. CRENAME + cpa rtPCR detected as few as one C. perfringens CFU per 100 ml of drinking water sample in less than 5 h, whereas mCP agar took at least 25 h to deliver results. CRENAME + cpa rtPCR also allows the simultaneous and sensitive detection of Escherichia coli and C. perfringens from the same potable water sample. In itself, it could be used to assess the public health risk posed by drinking water potentially contaminated with pathogens more resistant to disinfection.
机译:我们首先通过使用细菌菌株组确定了基于cpa基因(cpa rtPCR)的产气荚膜梭菌特异性实时PCR(rtPCR)测定的分析特异性和普遍性(即检测所有或大多数菌株的能力)。产气荚膜梭菌和非产气荚膜梭菌梭菌菌株的分离。使用cpa rtPCR,所有非产气荚膜梭菌梭菌菌株均检测为阴性,而所有产气荚膜梭菌菌株均检测为阳性,其分析特异性和普遍性为100%。然后,使用cpa rtPCR分析法确认过滤水样品并在mCP琼脂上培养后回收的116种假定的产气荚膜梭菌分离株的身份。通过对16S rRNA和cpa基因进行测序,鉴定出在mCP琼脂表型和cpa rtPCR之间表现出不一致结果的菌落。四个mCP〜(+)/ rtPCR〜(+)菌落被鉴定为产气荚膜梭菌,而3个mCP〜(+)/ rtPCR〜(?)菌落被鉴定为非产气荚膜梭菌。所有51个非产气荚膜梭菌菌株的cpa rtPCR均为阴性,65个产气荚膜梭菌菌株中的64个为阳性。最后,我们比较了mCP琼脂和CRENAME(微生物颗粒的浓度和回收率,核酸的抽出和分子富集)程序以及cpa rtPCR(CRENAME + cpa rtPCR)的检测C能力。在饮用水中产气荚膜孢子。在不到5小时的时间内,每100毫升饮用水样品中CRENAME + cpa rtPCR检测到少至1个产气荚膜梭状芽胞杆菌CFU,而mCP琼脂至少需要25小时才能产生结果。 CRENAME + cpa rtPCR还可以从同一饮用水样品中同时灵敏地检测大肠杆菌和产气荚膜梭菌。它本身可用于评估可能被更难于消毒的病原体污染的饮用水带来的公共健康风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号