首页> 外文期刊>Applied Microbiology >Microbial Removal of Atmospheric Carbon Tetrachloride in Bulk Aerobic Soils
【24h】

Microbial Removal of Atmospheric Carbon Tetrachloride in Bulk Aerobic Soils

机译:大量好氧土壤中大气四氯化碳的微生物去除

获取原文
       

摘要

Atmospheric concentrations of carbon tetrachloride (CCl_(4)) were removed by bulk aerobic soils from tropical, subtropical, and boreal environments. Removal was observed in all tested soil types, indicating that the process was widespread. The flux measured in field chamber experiments was 0.24 ± 0.10 nmol CCl_(4) (m~(2) day)~(?1) (average ± standard deviation [SD]; n = 282). Removal of CCl_(4) and removal of methane (CH_(4)) were compared to explore whether the two processes were linked. Removal of both gases was halted in laboratory samples that were autoclaved, dry heated, or incubated in the presence of mercuric chloride (HgCl_(2)). In marl soils, treatment with antibiotics such as tetracycline and streptomycin caused partial inhibition of CCl_(4) (50%) and CH_(4) (76%) removal, but removal was not affected in soils treated with nystatin or myxothiazol. These data indicated that bacteria contributed to the soil removal of CCl_(4) and that microeukaryotes may not have played a significant role. Amendments of methanol, acetate, and succinate to soil samples enhanced CCl_(4) removal by 59%, 293%, and 72%, respectively. Additions of a variety of inhibitors and substrates indicated that nitrification, methanogenesis, or biological reduction of nitrate, nitrous oxide, or sulfate (e.g., occurring in possible anoxic microzones) did not play a significant role in the removal of CCl_(4). Methyl fluoride inhibited removal of CH_(4) but not CCl_(4), indicating that CH_(4) and CCl_(4) removals were not directly linked. Furthermore, CCl_(4) removal was not affected in soils amended with copper sulfate or methane, supporting the results with MeF and suggesting that the observed CCl_(4) removal was not significantly mediated by methanotrophs.
机译:大气中的四氯化碳(CCl_(4))被热带,亚热带和北方环境中的大量好氧土壤去除。在所有测试的土壤类型中均观察到去除效果,表明该过程广泛存在。在现场试验室实验中测得的通量为0.24±0.10 nmol CCl_(4)(m〜(2)天)〜(?1)(平均值±标准偏差[SD]; n = 282)。比较了去除CCl_(4)和去除甲烷(CH_(4))的方法,以探讨这两个过程是否相关。在高压灭菌,干燥加热或在氯化汞(HgCl_(2))孵育的实验室样品中停止两种气体的去除。在泥土中,用四环素和链霉素等抗生素处理可部分抑制CCl_(4)(50%)和CH_(4)(76%)的去除,但在用制霉菌素或霉菌唑处理的土壤中去除效果不受影响。这些数据表明细菌有助于去除CCl_(4)的土壤,而微真核生物可能没有发挥重要作用。甲醇,乙酸盐和琥珀酸盐对土壤样品的修正使CCl_(4)的去除率分别提高了59%,293%和72%。各种抑制剂和底物的添加表明硝化,甲烷生成或硝酸盐,一氧化二氮或硫酸盐的生物还原(例如发生在可能的缺氧微区中)在CCl_(4)的去除中不起重要作用。氟化甲烷抑制了CH_(4)的去除,但抑制了CCl_(4)的去除,表明CH_(4)和CCl_(4)的去除没有直接联系。此外,在用硫酸铜或甲烷改良的土壤中,CCl_(4)的去除不受影响,支持MeF的结果,并表明所观察到的CCl_(4)的去除不是由甲烷营养菌介导的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号