首页> 外文期刊>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Distribution of Human-Specific Bacteroidales and Fecal Indicator Bacteria in an Urban Watershed Impacted by Sewage Pollution, Determined Using RNA- and DNA-Based Quantitative PCR Assays
【24h】

Distribution of Human-Specific Bacteroidales and Fecal Indicator Bacteria in an Urban Watershed Impacted by Sewage Pollution, Determined Using RNA- and DNA-Based Quantitative PCR Assays

机译:使用基于RNA和DNA的定量PCR测定法确定受污水污染影响的城市集水区中人类特异性细菌和粪便指示菌的分布

获取原文
           

摘要

The identification of fecal pollution sources is commonly carried out using DNA-based methods. However, there is evidence that DNA can be associated with dead cells or present as “naked DNA” in the environment. Furthermore, it has been shown that rRNA-targeted reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assays can be more sensitive than rRNA gene-based qPCR assays since metabolically active cells usually contain higher numbers of ribosomes than quiescent cells. To this end, we compared the detection frequency of host-specific markers and fecal bacteria using RNA-based RT-qPCR and DNA-based qPCR methods for water samples collected in sites impacted by combined sewer overflows. As a group, fecal bacteria were more frequently detected in most sites using RNA-based methods. Specifically, 8, 87, and 85% of the samples positive for general enterococci, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium markers, respectively, were detected using RT-qPCR, but not with the qPCR assay counterpart. On average, two human-specific Bacteroidales markers were not detected when using DNA in 12% of the samples, while they were positive for all samples when using RNA (cDNA) as the template. Moreover, signal intensity was up to three orders of magnitude higher in RT-qPCR assays than in qPCR assays. The human-specific Bacteroidales markers exhibited moderate correlation with conventional fecal indicators using RT-qPCR results, suggesting the persistence of nonhuman sources of fecal pollution or the presence of false-positive signals. In general, the results from this study suggest that RNA-based assays can increase the detection sensitivity of fecal bacteria in urban watersheds impacted with human fecal sources.
机译:粪便污染源的鉴定通常使用基于DNA的方法进行。但是,有证据表明,DNA可以与死细胞相关联或在环境中以“裸露的DNA”形式存在。此外,已显示靶向rRNA的逆转录定量PCR(RT-qPCR)分析比基于rRNA基因的qPCR分析更敏感,因为代谢活性细胞通常比静止细胞包含更多的核糖体。为此,我们比较了使用基于RNA的RT-qPCR和基于DNA的qPCR方法对受下水道溢流影响的地点收集的水样中宿主特异性标志物和粪便细菌的检测频率。作为一个整体,使用基于RNA的方法在大多数部位检测粪便细菌的频率更高。具体而言,使用RT-qPCR分别检测了普通肠球菌,粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌标记阳性的8、87和85%的样品,但使用qPCR分析对应物未检测到。平均而言,在12%的样本中使用DNA时,未检测到两个人类特异性的细菌标记,而在以RNA(cDNA)为模板时,它们在所有样本中均为阳性。此外,RT-qPCR分析中的信号强度比qPCR分析中的信号强度高出三个数量级。使用RT-qPCR结果,人类特异性细菌纲标记物与常规粪便指标表现出中等相关性,表明非人类粪便污染源的持续存在或假阳性信号的存在。总体而言,这项研究的结果表明,基于RNA的检测可以提高受人类粪便来源影响的城市流域中粪便细菌的检测灵敏度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号