...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Association between helicopter with physician versus ground emergency medical services and survival of adults with major trauma in Japan
【24h】

Association between helicopter with physician versus ground emergency medical services and survival of adults with major trauma in Japan

机译:日本直升飞机与医师对地面紧急医疗服务与成年人重大创伤的生存之间的关系

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

IntroductionHelicopter emergency medical services with a physician (HEMS) has been provided in Japan since 2001. However, HEMS and its possible effect on outcomes for severe trauma patients have still been debated as helicopter services require expensive and limited resources. Our aim was to analyze the association between the use of helicopters with a physician versus ground services and survival among adults with serious traumatic injuries.MethodsThis multicenter prospective observational study involved 24,293 patients. All patients were older than 15?years of age, had sustained blunt or penetrating trauma and had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) higher than 15. All of the patient data were recorded between 2004 and 2011 in the Japan Trauma Data Bank, which includes data from 114 major emergency hospitals in Japan. The primary outcome was survival to discharge from hospitals. The intervention was either transport by helicopter with a physician or ground emergency services.ResultsA total of 2,090 patients in the sample were transported by helicopter, and 22,203 were transported by ground. Overall, 546 patients (26.1%) transported by helicopter died compared to 5,765 patients (26.0%) transported by ground emergency services. Patients transported by helicopter had higher ISSs than those transported by ground. In multivariable logistic regression, helicopter transport had an odds ratio (OR) for survival to discharge of 1.277 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.049 to 1.556) after adjusting for age, sex, mechanism of injury, type of trauma, initial vital signs (including systolic blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate), ISS and prehospital treatment (including intubation, airway protection maneuver and intravenous fluid). In the propensity score–matched cohort, helicopter transport was associated with improved odds of survival compared to ground transport (OR, 1.446; 95% CI, 1.220 to 1.714). In conditional logistic regression, after adjusting for prehospital treatment (including intubation, airway protection maneuver and intravenous fluid), similar positive associations were observed (OR, 1.230; 95% CI, 1.017 to 1.488).ConclusionsAmong patients with major trauma in Japan, transport by helicopter with a physician may be associated with improved survival to hospital discharge compared to ground emergency services after controlling for multiple known confounders.
机译:简介自2001年以来,日本已向医生提供了直升机急诊医疗服务(HEMS)。但是,由于直升机服务需要昂贵且有限的资源,因此HEMS及其对严重创伤患者结局的可能影响一直存在争议。我们的目的是分析医师使用直升机与地面服务之间的联系以及成年人遭受严重创伤的存活率。方法该多中心前瞻性观察研究涉及24,293名患者。所有患者年龄均超过15岁,持续遭受钝器或穿透性创伤,伤害严重度评分(ISS)高于15。所有患者数据均记录在2004年至2011年之间的日本创伤数据库中,其中包括来自日本114家主要急诊医院的数据。主要结局是从医院出院生存。干预措施是通过带医生的直升飞机运送或进行地面急救。结果样本中共有2,090例患者被直升飞机运送,其中22,203例被地面运送。总体而言,直升机运送的546例患者(占26.1%)死亡,而地面紧急服务运送的5,765例(26.0%)患者死亡。直升机运送的患者的ISS比地面运送的患者更高。在多变量logistic回归中,在调整了年龄,性别,伤害机制,创伤类型,初始生命因素后,直升机运输的出院生存比值比(OR)为1.277(95%置信区间(CI)为1.049至1.556)。体征(包括收缩压,心率和呼吸频率),ISS和院前治疗(包括插管,气道保护动作和静脉输液)。在倾向得分匹配的队列中,与地面运输相比,直升机运输具有更高的生存几率(OR为1.446; 95%CI为1.220至1.714)。在条件Logistic回归分析中,在调整院前治疗(包括插管,气道保护策略和静脉输液)后,观察到相似的正相关性(OR,1.230; 95%CI,1.017至1.488)。结论在日本有重大创伤的患者中,运输与地面紧急服务相比,控制多个已知的混杂因素后,与医生一起乘坐直升飞机与住院患者的生存时间可能得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号