首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Severe endothelial injury and subsequent repair in patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation
【24h】

Severe endothelial injury and subsequent repair in patients after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation

机译:心肺复苏成功后患者的严重内皮损伤和随后的修复

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionIschemia and reperfusion after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) induce endothelial activation and systemic inflammatory response, resulting in post-resuscitation disease. In this study we analyzed direct markers of endothelial injury, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial microparticles (EMPs), and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) as a marker of endothelial repair in patients after CPR.MethodsFirst we investigated endothelial injury in 40 patients after CPR, 30 controls with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), and 9 healthy subjects, who were included to measure CECs and EMPs. In a subsequent study, endothelial repair was assessed by EPC measurement in 15 CPR, 9 CAD, and 5 healthy subjects. Blood samples were drawn immediately and 24 hours after ROSC and analyzed by flow cytometry. For all statistical analyses P < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThere was a massive rise in CEC count in resuscitated patients compared to CAD (4,494.1 ± 1,246 versus 312.7 ± 41 cells/mL; P < 0.001) and healthy patients (47.5 ± 3.7 cells/mL; P < 0.0005). Patients after prolonged CPR (≥30 min) showed elevated CECs compared to those resuscitated for <30 min (6,216.6 ± 2,057 versus 2,340.9 ± 703.5 cells/mL; P = 0.13s). There was a significant positive correlation of CEC count with duration of CPR (R2= 0.84; P < 0.01). EMPs were higher immediately after CPR compared to controls (31.2 ± 5.8 versus 19.7 ± 2.4 events/μL; P = 0.12 (CAD); versus 15.0 ± 5.2 events/μL; P = 0.07 (healthy)) but did not reach significance until 24 hours after CPR (69.1 ± 12.4 versus 22.0 ± 3.0 events/μL; P < 0.005 (CAD); versus 15.4 ± 4.4 events/μL; P < 0.001 (healthy)). EPCs were significantly elevated in patients on the second day after CPR compared to CAD (1.16 ± 0.41 versus 0.02 ± 0.01% of lymphocytes; P < 0.005) and healthy (0.04 ± 0.01; P < 0.005).ConclusionsIn the present study we provide evidence for a severe endothelial damage after successful CPR. Our results point to an ongoing process of endothelial injury, paralleled by a subsequent endothelial regeneration 24 hours after resuscitation.
机译:简介心肺复苏(CPR)后的缺血和再灌注诱导内皮激活和全身性炎症反应,从而导致复苏后疾病。在这项研究中,我们分析了内皮损伤,循环内皮细胞(CEC)和内皮微粒(EMPs)以及内皮祖细胞(EPC)的直接标志物,作为CPR后患者内皮修复的标志物。方法首先,我们调查了40例患者的内皮损伤心肺复苏后,有30名患有稳定冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的对照和9名健康受试者被纳入测量CEC和EMP的范围。在随后的研究中,通过EPC测量评估了15例CPR,9例CAD和5例健康受试者的内皮修复。立即和ROSC后24小时抽取血样,并通过流式细胞仪分析。对于所有统计分析,P <0.05被认为是显着的。结果与CAD(4,494.1±1,246与312.7±41细胞/ mL; P <0.001)和健康患者(47.5±3.7细胞/ mL)相比,复苏患者的CEC计数大量增加。 ; P <0.0005)。与复苏<30 min的患者相比,延长CPR(≥30min)的患者的CEC升高(6,216.6±2,057对2,340.9±703.5细胞/ mL; P = 0.13 / ns)。 CEC计数与CPR持续时间呈显着正相关(R2 = 0.84; P <0.01)。心肺复苏后立即EMPs高于对照组(31.2±5.8对19.7±2.4事件/μL; P = 0.12(CAD);对15.0±5.2事件/μL; P = 0.07(健康)),但直到24心肺复苏后数小时(69.1±12.4对22.0±3.0事件/μL; P <0.005(CAD);对15.4±4.4事件/μL; P <0.001(健康))。与CAD(1.16±0.41 vs 0.02±0.01%的淋巴细胞; P <0.005)和健康(0.04±0.01; P <0.005)的CAD相比,CPR后第二天患者的EPC显着升高。成功进行心肺复苏后严重的内皮损伤。我们的研究结果表明了内皮损伤的持续过程,并伴随着复苏后24小时的内皮再生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号