首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >The Simple Triage Scoring System (STSS) successfully predicts mortality and critical care resource utilization in H1N1 pandemic flu: a retrospective analysis
【24h】

The Simple Triage Scoring System (STSS) successfully predicts mortality and critical care resource utilization in H1N1 pandemic flu: a retrospective analysis

机译:简单分类评分系统(STSS)可以成功预测H1N1大流行性流感的死亡率和重症监护资源的利用:一项回顾性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionTriage protocols are only initiated when it is apparent that resource deficits will occur across a broad geographical area despite efforts to expand or acquire additional capacity. Prior to the pandemic the UK Department of Health (DOH) recommended the use of a staged triage plan incorporating Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) developed by the Ontario Ministry of Health to assist in the triage of critical care admissions and discharges during an influenza outbreak in the UK. There are data to suggest that had it been used in the recent H1N1 pandemic it may have led to inappropriate limitation of therapy if surge capacity had been overwhelmed.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the performance of the Simple Triage Scoring System (STSS) as an indicator of the utilization of hospital resources in adult patients with confirmed H1N1 admitted to a university teaching hospital. Our aim was to compare it against the staged initial SOFA score process with regards to mortality, need for intensive care admission and requirement for mechanical ventilation and assess its validity.ResultsOver an 8 month period, 62 patients with confirmed H1N1 were admitted. Forty (65%) had documented comorbidities and 27 (44%) had pneumonic changes on their admission CXR. Nineteen (31%) were admitted to the intensive care unit where 5 (26%) required mechanical ventilation (MV). There were 3 deaths. The STSS group categorization demonstrated a better discriminating accuracy in predicting critical care resource usage with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (95% confidence interval) for ICU admission of 0.88 (0.78-0.98) and need for MV of 0.91 (0.83-0.99). This compared to the staged SOFA score of 0.77 (0.65-0.89) and 0.87 (0.72-1.00) respectively. Low mortality rates limited analysis on survival predictions.ConclusionsThe STSS accurately risk stratified patients in this cohort according to their risk of death and predicted the likelihood of admission to critical care and the requirement for MV. Its single point in time, accuracy and easily collected component variables commend it as an alternative reproducible system to facilitate the triage and treatment of patients in any future influenza pandemic.
机译:简介仅当很明显在努力扩大或获取额外容量的情况下在整个地理区域内都将出现资源短缺时,才启动分流协议。在大流行之前,英国卫生部(DOH)建议使用分阶段的分诊计划,该计划应结合安大略省卫生部制定的败血症相关器官衰竭评估(SOFA),以协助分诊重症监护病房和出院。英国爆发流感。有数据表明,如果在近期的H1N1大流行中使用它,可能会导致激增能力被淹没,从而导致不适当地限制治疗。方法我们回顾性地回顾了简单分类评分系统(STSS)的性能,作为该指标的指标。成人医院确诊的H1N1确诊患者的医院资源利用情况。我们的目的是将其与分阶段的初始SOFA评分过程进行比较,以评估其死亡率,重症监护的需要和机械通气的需求,并评估其有效性。结果在8个月的时间里,有62例确诊为H1N1的患者入院。四十(65%)有合并症,入院CXR时有肺炎变化(27)(44%)。重症监护病房收治了十九名(31%),其中五名(26%)需要机械通气(MV)。有3人死亡。 STSS组分类在预测重症监护资源使用方面具有更好的区分准确性,曲线下(95%置信区间)下的接受者工作特征区域允许ICU入院0.88(0.78-0.98),MV需要0.91(0.83-0.99) )。相比之下,分阶段的SOFA得分分别为0.77(0.65-0.89)和0.87(0.72-1.00)。低死亡率限制了对生存预测的分析。结论STSS根据该队列中的死亡风险准确地对分层患者进行风险分析,并预测接受重症监护的可能性和MV需求。它的单一时间点,准确性和易于收集的组成变量称赞它是可替代的可重现系统,可促进在未来任何流感大流行中对患者进行分类和治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号