...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Variation in the use of renal replacement therapy in patients with septic shock: a substudy of the prospective multicenter observational FINNAKI study
【24h】

Variation in the use of renal replacement therapy in patients with septic shock: a substudy of the prospective multicenter observational FINNAKI study

机译:败血症性休克患者肾脏替代疗法的使用差异:前瞻性多中心观察性FINNAKI研究的子研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

IntroductionIndications for renal replacement therapy (RRT) have not been generally standardized and vary among intensive care units (ICUs). We aimed to assess the proportion, indications, and modality of RRT, as well as the association between the proportion of RRT use and 90-day mortality in patients with septic shock in Finnish adult ICUs.MethodsWe identified patients with septic shock from the prospective observational multicenter FINNAKI study conducted between 1 September 2011 and 1 February 2012. We divided the ICUs into high-RRT and low-RRT ICUs according to the median of the proportion of RRT-treated patients with septic shock. Differences in indications, and modality of RRT between ICU groups were assessed. Finally, we performed an adjusted logistic regression analysis to evaluate the possible association of the ICU group (high vs. low-RRT) with 90-day mortality.ResultsOf the 726 patients with septic shock, 131 (18.0%, 95% CI 15.2 to 20.9%) were treated with RRT. The proportion of RRT-treated patients varied from 3% up to 36% (median 19%) among ICUs. High-RRT ICUs included nine ICUs (354 patients) and low-RRT ICUs eight ICUs (372 patients). In the high-RRT ICUs patients with septic shock were older (P?=?0.04), had more cardiovascular (P <0.001) and renal failures (P?=?0.003) on the first day in the ICU, were more often mechanically ventilated, and received higher maximum doses of norepinephrine (0.25?μg/kg/min vs. 0.18?μg/kg/min, P <0.001) than in the low-RRT ICUs. No significant differences in indications for or modality of RRT existed between the ICU groups. The crude 90-day mortality rate for patients with septic shock was 36.2% (95% CI 31.1 to 41.3%) in the high-RRT ICUs compared to 33.9% (95% CI 29.0 to 38.8%) in the low-RRT ICUs, P?=?0.5. In an adjusted logistic regression analysis the ICU group (high-RRT or low-RRT ICUs) was not associated with 90-day mortality.ConclusionsPatients with septic shock in ICUs with a high proportion of RRT had more severe organ dysfunctions and received more organ-supportive treatments. Importantly, the ICU group (high-RRT or low-RRT group) was not associated with 90-day mortality.
机译:简介肾脏替代疗法(RRT)的适应症尚未普遍标准化,并且在重症监护病房(ICU)之间有所不同。我们旨在评估芬兰成人ICU感染性休克患者的RRT比例,适应症和治疗方式,以及RRT使用比例与90天死亡率之间的关系。 FINNAKI多中心研究于2011年9月1日至2012年2月1日进行。我们根据RRT治疗的感染性休克患者的中位数将ICU分为高RRT和低RRT ICU。评估了ICU组之间适应症和RRT方式的差异。最后,我们进行了调整后的Logistic回归分析,以评估ICU组(高RRT与低RRT)与90天死亡率的可能关联。结果在726名败血性休克患者中,有131名(18.0%,95%CI 15.2) 20.9%)用RRT治疗。在ICU中,接受RRT治疗的患者比例从3%到36%(中位数19%)不等。高RRT ICU包括9个ICU(354例患者),低RRT ICU包括8个ICU(372例患者)。在高RRT的ICU中,感染性休克患者年龄较大(P?=?0.04),在ICU的第一天有更多的心血管疾病(P <0.001)和肾功能衰竭(P?=?0.003),更经常是机械性的通风良好,去甲肾上腺素的最大剂量(0.25?μg/ kg / min与0.18?μg/ kg / min,P <0.001)比低RRT ICU高。 ICU组之间在RRT适应症或治疗方式上无显着差异。高RRT重症监护病房中败血症性休克患者90天的粗死亡率为36.2%(95%CI 31.1至41.3%),而低RRT ICU为33.9%(95%CI 29.0至38.8%), P≥0.5。在校正后的Logistic回归分析中,ICU组(高RRT或低RRT ICU)与90天死亡率无关。结论RRT比例较高的ICU中败血症性休克患者的器官功能障碍更严重,接受的器官更多支持治疗。重要的是,ICU组(高RRT或低RRT组)与90天死亡率无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号