首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions
【24h】

End-expiratory lung volume during mechanical ventilation: a comparison with reference values and the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure in intensive care unit patients with different lung conditions

机译:机械通气期间呼气末肺容积:与参考值的比较以及不同肺部状况的重症监护病房患者呼气末正压的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionFunctional residual capacity (FRC) reference values are obtained from spontaneous breathing patients, and are measured in the sitting or standing position. During mechanical ventilation FRC is determined by the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and it is therefore better to speak of end-expiratory lung volume. Application of higher levels of PEEP leads to increased end-expiratory lung volume as a result of recruitment or further distention of already ventilated alveoli. The aim of this study was to measure end-expiratory lung volume in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different types of lung pathology at different PEEP levels, and to compare them with predicted sitting FRC values, arterial oxygenation, and compliance values.MethodsEnd-expiratory lung volume measurements were performed at PEEP levels reduced sequentially (15, 10 and then 5 cmH2O) in 45 mechanically ventilated patients divided into three groups according to pulmonary condition: normal lungs (group N), primary lung disorder (group P), and secondary lung disorder (group S).ResultsIn all three groups, end-expiratory lung volume decreased significantly (P < 0.001) while PEEP decreased from 15 to 5 cmH2O, whereas the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction did not change. At 5 cmH2O PEEP, end-expiratory lung volume was 31, 20, and 17 ml/kg predicted body weight in groups N, P, and S, respectively. These measured values were only 66%, 42%, and 34% of the predicted sitting FRC. A correlation between change in end-expiratory lung volume and change in dynamic compliance was found in group S (P < 0.001; R2 = 0.52), but not in the other groups.ConclusionsEnd-expiratory lung volume measured at 5 cmH2O PEEP was markedly lower than predicted sitting FRC values in all groups. Only in patients with secondary lung disorders were PEEP-induced changes in end-expiratory lung volume the result of derecruitment. In combination with compliance, end-expiratory lung volume can provide additional information to optimize the ventilator settings.
机译:简介功能残余容量(FRC)参考值是从自然呼吸患者获得的,并在坐着或站立时进行测量。在机械通气期间,FRC由呼气末正压(PEEP)的水平确定,因此最好说呼气末肺容积。由于募集或进一步扩张已经通气的肺泡,使用较高水平的PEEP会导致呼气末肺体积增加。这项研究的目的是测量在不同PEEP水平下具有不同类型肺病的机械通气重症监护病房(ICU)患者的呼气末肺体积,并将其与预测的坐位FRC值,动脉氧合和顺应性值进行比较方法对45名机械通气患者按PEEP水平依次降低(分别为15、10,然后5 cmH2O)进行呼气末肺量测定,根据肺部疾病将其分为三组:正常肺(N组),原发性肺部疾病(P组)结果)在所有三组中,呼气末肺体积显着下降(P <0.001),而PEEP从15 cmH2O下降至5 cmH2O,而动脉血氧张力与吸入氧分率之比却没有更改。在5 cmH2O PEEP下,N,P和S组的预测呼气末肺体积分别为31、20和17 ml / kg预测体重。这些测量值仅是预测的坐式FRC的66%,42%和34%。 S组发现呼气末肺体积变化与动态顺应性变化之间存在相关性(P <0.001; R2 = 0.52),而其他组则无此结论。结论在5 cmH2O PEEP下测得的呼气末肺体积明显更低比所有组的坐姿FRC预测值都高。只有在继发性肺部疾病的患者中,PEEP诱导的呼气末肺容量变化是减少招募的结果。与顺应性相结合,呼气末肺体积可以提供更多信息以优化呼吸机设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号