...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a nationwide population-based study in Japan
【24h】

Monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a nationwide population-based study in Japan

机译:小儿院外心脏骤停患者的单相和双相除颤:日本一项基于人群的全国性研究

获取原文

摘要

IntroductionConventional monophasic defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest patients have been replaced with biphasic defibrillators. However, the advantage of biphasic over monophasic defibrillation for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest patients remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest patients who underwent monophasic defibrillation with those who underwent biphasic defibrillation.MethodsThis prospective, nationwide, population-based observational study included pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest patients from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2009. The primary outcome measure was survival at 1 month with minimal neurologic impairment. The secondary outcome measures were survival at 1 month and the return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent association between defibrillator type (monophasic or biphasic) and outcomes.ResultsAmong 5,628 pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac-arrest patients (1 through 17 years old), 430 who received defibrillation shock with monophasic or biphasic defibrillator were analyzed. The number of patients who received defibrillation shock with monophasic defibrillator was 127 (30%), and 303 (70%) received defibrillation shock with biphasic defibrillator. The survival rates at 1 month with minimal neurologic impairment were 17.5% and 24.4%, the survival rates at 1 month were 32.3% and 35.6%, and the rates of return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival were 24.4% and 27.4% in the monophasic and biphasic defibrillator groups, respectively. Hierarchic logistic regression analyses by using generalized estimation equations found no significant difference between the two groups in terms of 1-month survival with minimal neurologic impairment (odds ratio (OR), 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87 to 2.83; P = 0.14) and 1-month survival (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.87 to 2.18; P = 0.17).ConclusionsThe present nationwide population-based observational study could not confirm an advantage of biphasic over monophasic defibrillators for pediatric OHCA patients.
机译:简介用于院外心脏骤停患者的常规单相除颤器已被双相除颤器取代。然而,对于小儿院外心脏骤停患者,双相优于单相除颤的优势仍然未知。这项研究旨在比较接受单相除颤的小儿院外心脏骤停患者和接受双相除颤的小儿心脏骤停患者的生存结局。自2005年1月1日至2009年12月31日的患者。主要结局指标为1个月生存率,神经系统损害最小。次要结果指标是1个月生存率和到达医院前自然循环的恢复。通过多变量logistic回归分析确定除颤器类型(单相或双相)与结局之间的独立关系。结果在5628例小儿院外心脏骤停患者(1至17岁)中,有430例接受单相或单相除颤电击对双相除颤器进行了分析。单相除颤器接受除颤电击的患者人数为127(30%),双相除颤器接受303除颤器的患者(70%)。单相的1个月生存率分别为17.5%和24.4%,1个月生存率分别为32.3%和35.6%,住院前自发性循环的返还率分别为24.4%和27.4%和双相除颤器组。使用广义估计方程的分层逻辑回归分析发现,两组之间在1个月生存率和最小神经功能缺损方面无显着差异(优势比(OR)为1.57; 95%置信区间(CI)为0.87至2.83; P = 0.14)和1个月生存率(OR,1.38; 95%CI,0.87至2.18; P = 0.17)。结论这项基于人群的全国性观察性研究无法证实双相相较于单相除颤器对小儿OHCA患者具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号