首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Wrong Biochemistry Results: Two Case Reports and Observational Study in 5310 Patients on Potentially Misleading Thyroid-stimulating Hormone and Gonadotropin Immunoassay Results
【24h】

Wrong Biochemistry Results: Two Case Reports and Observational Study in 5310 Patients on Potentially Misleading Thyroid-stimulating Hormone and Gonadotropin Immunoassay Results

机译:错误的生化结果:5310例潜在误导性甲状腺刺激激素和促性腺激素免疫测定结果的病例报告和观察性研究两篇

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Immunoassays are used in almost all medical and surgical specialties, but they suffer from interference from proteins such as antibodies in some patients’ sera. Such interferences are usually reported in the literature only as case reports after the introduction of a new assay.Methods: We undertook a prospective observational study on 5310 patients for whom the common immunoassay tests for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and/or gonadotropins were requested. All TSH and gonadotropin results were critically assessed for a mismatch between the clinical details and analytical results to identify samples suspected of analytical unreliability. These were tested further by three approaches to screen for interference.Results: From the 5310 sets of results, 59 patients’ samples were identified as suspect and were tested further. Analytically incorrect results were found in 28 (0.53% of the total studied). The magnitude of interference varied, but in 23 of 28 patients (82%), it was considered large enough to have a potentially adverse effect on cost and/or the clinical care of these patients. Two cases, described in detail, illustrate the adverse effect of error on patient care and cost, and the second highlights the difficulties and limitations of current approaches for identifying interference and inaccuracy in immunoassays.Conclusions: Because millions of TSH/gonadotropin tests are carried out in UK hospital laboratories alone, our data suggest that thousands of patients could be adversely affected by errors from interferences. Early identification of interference in cases with unusual results could be valuable.
机译:背景:免疫分析几乎用于所有的医学和外科专业,但它们在某些患者血清中受到诸如抗体之类的蛋白质的干扰。方法:我们对5310例患者进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,前者是对5310例患者进行了前瞻性观察性研究,这些患者的甲状腺刺激激素(TSH)和/或促性腺激素是常规免疫测定方法。要求。严格评估所有TSH和促性腺激素的结果,以确保临床细节与分析结果之间不匹配,以鉴定怀疑分析不可靠的样品。结果:通过5310套结果中,有59名患者的样品被鉴定为可疑样品,并进行了进一步测试。在28个分析结果中发现了错误的分析结果(占研究总数的0.53%)。干扰的程度各不相同,但在28位患者中有23位(82%)认为干扰足够大,可能会对这些患者的费用和/或临床护理产生潜在的不利影响。详细描述的两个案例说明了错误对患者护理和成本的不利影响,第二个案例突出了目前鉴定免疫测定中干扰和不准确性方法的困难和局限性。结论:由于进行了数百万次的TSH /促性腺激素测试仅在英国医院实验室,我们的数据表明,数千个患者可能受到干扰错误的不利影响。在异常结果的情况下及早发现干扰可能很有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号