首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Concentration Ratios of Morphine to Codeine in Blood of Impaired Drivers as Evidence of Heroin Use and not Medication with Codeine
【24h】

Concentration Ratios of Morphine to Codeine in Blood of Impaired Drivers as Evidence of Heroin Use and not Medication with Codeine

机译:受损驾驶员血液中吗啡与可待因的浓度比,是使用海洛因而非用可待因治疗的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Both the illicit drug heroin and the prescription drug codeine are metabolized to morphine, which tends to complicate interpretation of opiate-positive samples. We report here the concentrations of morphine and codeine, the morphine/codeine ratios, and 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM) in blood specimens from individuals arrested for driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) in Sweden. The results were compared with positive findings of 6-AM in urine as evidence of heroin intake.Methods: In 339 DUID suspects, both blood and urine specimens were available for toxicologic analysis. In another 882 cases, only blood was available. All specimens were initially analyzed by immunoassay, and the positive results were verified by isotope-dilution gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. In routine casework, the limits of quantification (LOQs) for unconjugated opiates were 5 ng/g for blood and 20 μg/L for urine.Results: The median concentration of morphine in blood was 30 ng/g with 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of 5 and 230 ng/g, respectively (n = 979). This compares with a median codeine concentration of 20 ng/g and 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles of 5 and 592 ng/g, respectively (n = 784). The specific metabolite of heroin, 6-AM, was identified in only 16 of 675 blood specimens (2.3%). This compares with positive findings of 6-AM in 212 of 339 urine samples (62%) from the same population of DUID suspects. When 6-AM was identified in urine, the morphine/codeine ratio in blood was always greater than unity (median, 6.0; range, 1–66). In 18 instances, 6-AM was present in urine, although morphine and codeine were below the LOQ in blood. The morphine/codeine ratio in blood was greater than unity in 85% of DUID cases when urine was not available (n = 506), and the median morphine and codeine concentrations were 70 ng/g and 10 ng/g, respectively. When morphine/codeine ratios in blood were less than unity (n = 76), the median morphine and codeine concentrations were 10 ng/g and 180 ng/g, respectively.Conclusions: Only 2.3% of opiate-positive DUID suspects were verified as heroin users on the basis of positive findings of 6-AM in blood. A much higher proportion (62%) were verified heroin users from 6-AM identified in urine. When urine was not available for analysis, finding a morphine/codeine concentration ratio in blood above unity suggests heroin use and not medication with codeine. This biomarker indicated that 85% of opiate-positive DUID blood samples were from heroin users.
机译:背景:非法毒品海洛因和处方药可待因均被代谢为吗啡,这会使鸦片阳性样品的解释复杂化。我们在这里报告了瑞典因毒品(DUID)影响而被捕的个人的血液样本中吗啡和可待因的浓度,吗啡/可待因比率和6-乙酰吗啡(6-AM)。将结果与尿液中6-AM阳性结果作为海洛因摄入量的证据进行比较。方法:在339名DUID嫌疑犯中,血液和尿液标本均可用于毒理学分析。在另外882例病例中,只有血液可用。所有标本均通过免疫分析进行初步分析,并通过同位素稀释气相色谱-质谱法验证了阳性结果。在常规案例研究中,非结合阿片类药物的定量限(LOQs)血液为5 ng / g,尿液为20μg/ L。结果:血液中吗啡的中位数浓度为30 ng / g,其中2.5和97.5个百分位数为5和分别为230 ng / g(n = 979)。相比之下,可待因的中位数浓度分别为20 ng / g,2.5和97.5个百分位数分别为5和592 ng / g(n = 784)。在675份血液样本中只有16份(2.3%)鉴定出海洛因的特定代谢产物6-AM。与之相比,在同一组DUID嫌疑犯中的339个尿液样本中的212个样本中,有6-AM阳性结果(占62%)。当尿液中发现6-AM时,血液中的吗啡/可待因比率始终大于统一(中位数6.0;范围1-66)。在18个实例中,尿液中存在6-AM,尽管吗啡和可待因在血液中的LOQ低于。在没有尿液的情况下(n = 506),在85%的DUID病例中,血液中的吗啡/可待因比大于1(n = 506),中毒吗啡和可待因的中位浓度分别为70 ng / g和10 ng / g。当血液中吗啡/可待因比率小于1时(n = 76),吗啡和可待因的中位数浓度分别为10 ng / g和180 ng / g。结论:仅2.3%的鸦片阳性DUID嫌疑人海洛因使用者在血液中6-AM阳性发现的基础上。在尿液中发现的6-AM证实海洛因使用者的比例更高(62%)。当无法进行尿液分析时,如果发现血液中的吗啡/可待因浓度比值超过1,则表明使用了海洛因而不是可待因药物。该生物标志物表明,鸦片剂阳性DUID血液样本中有85%来自海洛因使用者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号