...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Cancer >An evaluation of 6 short-term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens
【24h】

An evaluation of 6 short-term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens

机译:6种用于检测有机化学致癌物的短期测试的评估

获取原文

摘要

A number of tests have been described which are thought to be capable of identifying carcinogens without using the actual induction of cancer as an endpoint. This study compared the performance of 6 such tests on a selection of 120 organic chemicals. The tests studies were: (1) mutation of Salmonella typhimurium, (2) cell transformation, (3) degranulation of endoplasmic reticulum, (4) sebaceous gland suppression, (5) tetrazolium reduction and (6) subcutaneous implant. A further 4 tests were examined briefly, but were not included in the complete evaluation. The chemicals were classified into carcinogens (58) and non-carcinogens (62) on the basis of published experimental data, and into 1 of 4 broad chemical classes. There was considerable variation between tests in their ability to predict carcinogenicity, with the cell-transformation test and the bacterial-mutation test being the most accurate (94% and 93% accurate respectively). These 2 tests were considered to be of general use in screening, since they were clearly more accurate than the others. Statistical consideration of various combinations of these tests showed that the use of cell transformation and bacterial mutation together, provide an advantage over the use of either test alone. The inclusion of the other 4 tests in a screening battery predictably resulted in a great increase in overall inaccuracy and loss of discrimination, even though the detection of carcinogens is improved. All the tests were shown to generate both false positive and false negative results, a situation which may be controlled by the use, where possible, of appropriate chemical-class controls, to identify the test which is optimal for the class of chemical under test. Structural analogy may have a part to play in the rapid detection of environmental carcinogens, and some general guidelines for its use are given.
机译:已经描述了许多测试,这些测试被认为能够在不使用实际的癌症诱导作为终点的情况下识别致癌物。这项研究比较了120种有机化学品中6种测试的性能。测试研究包括:(1)鼠伤寒沙门氏菌突变,(2)细胞转化,(3)内质网脱粒,(4)皮脂腺抑制,(5)四唑还原和(6)皮下植入。简短地检查了另外4个测试,但没有包括在完整评估中。根据已发布的实验数据,这些化学物质分为致癌物质(58)和非致癌物质(62),并分为4大类化学物质之一。测试在预测致癌性的能力之间存在很大差异,其中最准确的是细胞转化测试和细菌突变测试(分别为94%和93%)。这两个测试被认为通常用于筛选,因为它们显然比其他测试更准确。这些测试的各种组合的统计考虑表明,与单独使用任一测试相比,将细胞转化和细菌突变一起使用可提供优势。即使改进了致癌物的检测,在筛选电池中包含其他4种测试也可以预期导致总体不准确性和辨别力的大大提高。显示所有测试均产生假阳性和假阴性结果,在适当情况下,可以通过使用适当的化学类别控制来控制这种情况,以识别最适合被测化学类别的测试。结构类比可能在环境致癌物的快速检测中发挥作用,并给出了一些通用的使用指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号