首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Scotland (ARTICS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Scotland (ARTICS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

机译:苏格兰增加结肠直肠癌筛查的预期增加感到遗憾(ARTICS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the UK. Screening is key to early detection. The Scottish programme of colorectal cancer screening is running successfully, and involves all adults aged between 50 and 74?years being invited to post back a faecal sample for testing every 2?years. However, screening uptake is sub-optimal: for example rates for the period November 2009 to October 2011 ranged from just 39% for males living in the most deprived areas to 67% for least deprived females. Recent research has shown that asking people to consider the emotional consequences of not participating in screening (anticipated regret) can lead to a significant increase in screening uptake. Methods/Design We will test a simple anticipated regret manipulation, in a large randomised controlled trial with 60,000 members of the general public. They will be randomly allocated to one of 3 arms, no questionnaire, control questionnaire or anticipated regret questionnaire. The primary outcome will be screening test kit return. Results will also be examined by demographic variables (age, gender, deprivation) as these are currently related to screening kit return. Discussion If this anticipated regret intervention leads to a significant increase in colorectal cancer screening kit returns, this would represent a rare example of a theoretically-driven, simple intervention that could result in earlier detection of colorectal cancer and many more lives saved. Trial registration Current Controlled trials: ISRCTN74986452
机译:背景结直肠癌是英国癌症死亡的第二大主要原因。筛查是早期发现的关键。苏格兰的大肠癌筛查计划正在成功运行,所有年龄在50至74岁之间的成年人都应邀回送粪便样本,每2年进行一次检测。但是,筛查的吸收率不是最理想的:例如,2009年11月至2011年10月的比率介于居住在最贫困地区的男性只有39%,到最贫困地区的67%。最近的研究表明,要求人们考虑不参加筛查的情绪后果(预期的遗憾)会导致筛查摄入量显着增加。方法/设计我们将在一个由60,000公众组成的大型随机对照试验中,测试一个简单的预期后悔操作。他们将被随机分配到三个部门之一,没有问卷,对照问卷或预期后悔问卷。主要结果将是筛选测试试剂盒。结果还将通过人口统计学变量(年龄,性别,贫困)进行检查,因为这些变量当前与筛查试剂盒的归还有关。讨论如果这种预期的后悔干预措施导致大肠癌筛查试剂盒的回报显着增加,那么这将是一个理论驱动的简单干预措施的罕见例子,它可以导致早期发现大肠癌并挽救更多生命。试用注册当前对照试验:ISRCTN74986452

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号