首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Evaluating the impact of environmental interventions across 2 countries: the International Bikeshare Impacts on Cycling and Collisions Study (IBICCS) Study protocol
【24h】

Evaluating the impact of environmental interventions across 2 countries: the International Bikeshare Impacts on Cycling and Collisions Study (IBICCS) Study protocol

机译:评估两个国家的环境干预措施的影响:国际自行车共享对自行车和碰撞的影响研究(IBICCS)研究方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Few international studies examine public bicycle share programs (PBSP) health impacts. We describe the protocol for the International Bikeshare Impacts on Cycling and Collisions Study (IBICCS). Methods A quasi-experimental non-equivalent groups design was used. Intervention cities (Montreal, Toronto, Boston, New York and Vancouver) were matched to control cities (Chicago, Detroit, and Philadelphia) on total population, population density, cycling rates, and average yearly temperature. The study used three repeated, cross-sectional surveys in intervention and control cities in Fall 2012 (baseline), 2013 (year 1), and 2014 (year 2). A non-probabilistic online panel survey with a sampling frame of individuals residing in and around areas where PBSP are/would be implemented was used. A total of 12,000 respondents will be sampled. In each of the 8 cities 1000 respondents will be sampled with an additional 4000 respondents sampled based on the total population of the city. Survey questions include measures of self-rated health, and self-reported height and weight, knowledge and experience using PBSP, physical activity, bicycle helmet use and history of collisions and injuries while cycling, socio-demographic questions, and home/workplace locations. Respondents could complete questionnaires in English, French, and Spanish. Two weights will be applied to the data: inverse probability of selection and post-stratification on age and sex. A triple difference analysis will be used. This approach includes in the models, time, exposure, and treatment group, and interaction terms between these variables to estimate changes across time, between exposure groups and between cities. Discussion There are scientific and practical challenges in evaluating PBSP. Methodological challenges included: appropriate sample recruitment, exchangeability of treatment and control groups, controlling unmeasured confounding, and specifying exposure. Practical challenges arise in the evaluation of environmental interventions such as a PBSP: one of the companies involved filed for bankruptcy, a Hurricane devastated New York City, and one PBSP was not implemented. Overall, this protocol provides methodological and practical guidance for researchers wanting to study PBSP impacts on health.
机译:背景技术很少有国际研究研究公共自行车共享计划(PBSP)对健康的影响。我们描述了国际自行车共享对骑行和碰撞研究(IBICCS)的协议。方法采用准实验非等效分组设计。干预城市(蒙特利尔,多伦多,波士顿,纽约和温哥华)的总人口,人口密度,自行车骑行率和年平均温度与对照城市(芝加哥,底特律和费城)相匹配。该研究在2012年秋季(基准),2013年(第一年)和2014年(第二年)对干预和控制城市进行了三项重复的横断面调查。使用了一个非概率在线小组调查,该调查采用居住在/将要实施PBSP的区域内和附近的个人抽样框架。总共将抽取12,000名受访者。在这8个城市中的每一个中,将抽样1000名受访者,并根据城市总人口抽取另外4000名受访者。调查问题包括自我评估的健康水平,自我报告的身高和体重,使用PBSP的知识和经验,体育锻炼,自行车头盔的使用以及骑车时发生碰撞和受伤的历史,社会人口统计学问题以及家庭/工作场所的位置。受访者可以用英语,法语和西班牙语填写调查表。将对数据应用两个权重:选择的逆概率和年龄和性别的后分层。将使用三重差异分析。该方法在模型中包括时间,接触和治疗组,以及这些变量之间的交互项,以估计随时间变化的,接触组之间和城市之间的变化。讨论在评估PBSP方面存在科学和实践挑战。方法上的挑战包括:适当地收集样本,治疗组和对照组的可交换性,控制无法测量的混杂以及指定暴露。在评估诸如PBSP之类的环境干预措施时出现了实际挑战:其中一家申请破产的公司,遭受飓风袭击的纽约市,还有一项未实施。总体而言,该协议为希望研究PBSP对健康的影响的研究人员提供了方法和实践指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号