首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa
【24h】

Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa

机译:验证南非建筑工人中艾滋病相关知识和污名的调查测量量表

获取原文
           

摘要

Construction workers in South Africa are regarded as a high-risk group in the context of HIV/AIDS. HIV testing is pivotal to controlling HIV transmission and providing palliative care and AIDS-related knowledge and stigma are key issues in addressing the likelihood of testing behaviour. In exploring these issues, various studies have employed an 11-item AIDS-related knowledge scale (Kalichman and Simbayi, AIDS Care 16:572-580, 2004) and a 9-item stigma scale (Kalichman et al., AIDS Behav 9:135-143, 2005), but little evidence exists confirming the psychometric properties of these scales. Using survey data from 512 construction workers in the Western Cape, South Africa, this research examines the validity and reliability of the two scales through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency tests. From confirmatory factor analysis, a revised 10-item knowledge scale was developed (χ2 /df ratio?=?1.675, CFI?=?0.982, RMSEA?=?0.038, and Hoelter (95?%) =393). A revised 8-item stigma scale was also developed (χ2 /df ratio?=?1.929, CFI?=?0.974, RMSEA?=?0.045, and Hoelter (95?%)?=?380). Both revised scales demonstrated good model fit and all factor loadings were significant (p?
机译:在艾滋病毒/艾滋病的背景下,南非的建筑工人被视为高危人群。艾滋病毒检测是控制艾滋病毒传播的关键,提供姑息治疗和与艾滋病相关的知识和污名化是解决检测行为可能性的关键问题。在探讨这些问题时,各种研究采用了11个项目的艾滋病相关知识量表(Kalichman和Simbayi,艾滋病护理16:572-580,2004)和9个项目的耻辱量表(Kalichman等人,AIDS Behav 9: 135-143,2005),但几乎没有证据证实这些量表的心理计量特性。本研究使用来自南非西开普省512名建筑工人的调查数据,通过探索性和验证性因素分析以及内部一致性测试,检验了两个量表的有效性和可靠性。通过验证性因素分析,制定了修订后的10个项目的知识量表(χ2/ df比值= 1.675,CFI = 0.998,RMSEA = 0.038,Hoelter(95%)= 393)。还开发了修改后的8个项目的柱头量表(χ2/ df比值≥1.929,CFI≥0.974,RMSEA≥0.045,Hoelter(95%)≥380。两种修订的量表均显示出良好的模型拟合性,所有因素负荷均显着(p <0.01)。可靠性分析显示出极好的内部一致性,alpha值分别为0.80和0.74。两种修订的量表也都显示出令人满意的收敛性和分歧性。从中获取数据的原始调查的局限性包括未能正确说明受访者选择语言来完成调查,使用种族作为识别参与者母语的代理,调查所依据的地理区域有限收集数据,并与便利性样本相关联的限制。验证研究的局限性在于缺乏可用数据,无法对可靠性进行更强大的检查,而无法进行内部一致性检查,例如重测可靠性。这里提供的修订后的知识和污名量表在南非建筑工人中作为与艾滋病相关知识和污名的量度具有很大的希望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号