首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >SRH and HrQOL: does social position impact differently on their link with health status?
【24h】

SRH and HrQOL: does social position impact differently on their link with health status?

机译:SRH和HrQOL:社会地位对他们与健康状况的联系是否有不同的影响?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Self-rated Health (SRH) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are used to evaluate health disparities. Like all subjective measures of health, they are dependent on health expectations that are associated with socioeconomic characteristics. It is thus needed to analyse the influence played by socioeconomic position (SEP) on the relationship between these two indicators and health conditions if we aim to use them to study health disparities. Our objective is to assess the influence of SEP on the relationship between physical health status and subjective health status, measured by SRH and HRQoL using the SF-36 scale. Methods We used data from the French National Health Survey. SEP was assessed by years of education and household annual income. Physical health status was measured by functional limitations and chronic low back pain. Results Regardless of their health status, people with lower SEP were more likely than their more socially advantaged counterparts to report poor SRH and poorer HRQoL, using any of the indicators of SEP. The negative impact of chronic low back pain on SRH was relatively greater in people with a high SEP than in those with a low SEP. In contrast, chronic low back pain and functional limitations had less impact on physical and mental component scores of quality of life for socially advantaged men and women. Conclusions Both SRH and HRQoL were lower among those reporting functional limitations or chronic low back pain. However, the change varied according SEP and the measure. In relative term, the negative impact of a given health condition seems to be greater on SRH and lower on HRQoL for people with higher SEP in comparison with people with low SEP. Using SRH could thus decrease socioeconomic differences. In contrast using HRQoL could increase these differences, suggesting being cautious when using these indicators for analyzing health disparities.
机译:背景自评健康(SRH)和与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)用于评估健康差异。像所有健康的主观指标一样,它们也取决于与社会经济特征相关的健康期望。因此,如果我们希望使用它们来研究健康差异,就需要分析社会经济地位(SEP)对这两个指标与健康状况之间关系的影响。我们的目标是通过SRH和HRQoL(使用SF-36量表)评估SEP对身体健康状况与主观健康状况之间关系的影响。方法我们使用了法国国家健康调查的数据。 SEP通过多年教育和家庭年收入进行评估。通过功能限制和慢性下腰痛来衡量身体健康状况。结果不论健康状况如何,使用SEP的任何指标,SEP较低的人比社会地位较高的人群更有可能报告SRH较差和HRQoL较差。与SEP较低的人相比,SEP较高的人慢性腰背痛对SRH的负面影响相对更大。相反,对于有社会优势的男人和女人来说,慢性腰背痛和功能受限对生活质量的身心组成部分的影响较小。结论在报告功能受限或慢性下腰痛的患者中,SRH和HRQoL均较低。但是,变化根据SEP和措施而有所不同。相对而言,与低SEP的人相比,给定健康状况对SRH较高的人的SRH负面影响似乎更大,而对HRQoL的负面影响则较小。因此,使用SRH可以减少社会经济差异。相反,使用HRQoL可能会增加这些差异,这表明在使用这些指标分析健康差异时要谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号