...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study
【24h】

Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians’ perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study

机译:为什么我们不定期筛查肛门癌-艾滋病医生对与男性发生性关系的HIV阳性男性的肛门癌及其筛查的观点:一项定性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Anal cancer is a priority health issue in HIV positive men who have sex with men. Anal cancer screening may be aimed at either detecting the precursor lesion (high grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia(HGAIN)) or early anal cancer. To date no qualitative study has explored the views of HIV physicians regarding anal cancer and its screening. Methods We conducted indepth interviews with 20 HIV physicians (Infectious diseases, Immunology, Sexual health, General practice) in different settings (hospital, sexual health centres, general practice) from around Australia. Framework analysis was used to identify themes. Results HIV physicians viewed anal cancer as a significant health issue and all agreed on the importance of anal cancer screening amongst HIV positive MSM if a valid screening method was available. Barriers for utilizing anal cytology was based primarily on the theme of insufficient evidence (e.g. no studies demonstrating reduction in mortality following screening or effective treatments for HGAIN). Barriers for utilizing DARE for early cancer detection were based on systemic factors (e.g. lack of opportunity, lack of priority, differences in HIV care practices); health provider factors (lack of evidence, difficulty discussing with patients, lack of confidence in DARE) and patient factors (perceived discomfort of DARE for patients, low anal cancer risk awareness). Physicians were willing to consider the idea of patient self-examination and partner-examination although concerns were raised regarding its reliability and issues surrounding partner dynamics. Conclusions HIV physicians remain ambivalent regarding the most effective means to screen for anal cancer. More research is needed to address the physicians’ concerns before anal cancer screening can be implemented into routine HIV care.
机译:背景技术肛门癌是与男性发生性关系的HIV阳性男性的首要健康问题。肛门癌筛查可能旨在检测前体病变(高级别肛门上皮内瘤变(HGAIN)或早期肛门癌。迄今为止,尚无定性研究探索HIV医生对肛门癌及其筛查的看法。方法我们对来自澳大利亚各地不同环境(医院,性健康中心,全科)的20位HIV医师(传染病,免疫学,性健康,全科)进行了深入访谈。框架分析用于确定主题。结果HIV医师认为肛门癌是一个重要的健康问题,如果可以使用有效的筛查方法,所有人都同意在HIV阳性MSM中进行肛门癌筛查的重要性。利用肛门细胞学的障碍主要是基于证据不足的主题(例如,尚无研究表明筛查或有效治疗HGAIN后死亡率降低)。利用DARE进行早期癌症检测的障碍是基于系统性因素(例如,缺乏机会,缺乏优先权,HIV护理实践的差异);健康提供者因素(缺乏证据,与患者讨论困难,对DARE缺乏信心)和患者因素(对患者DARE感到不适,肛门癌风险意识低)。尽管有人质疑患者的自检和伴侣检查的可靠性以及围绕伴侣动态的问题,但医生仍愿意考虑患者自我检查和伴侣检查的想法。结论HIV医师对筛查肛门癌的最有效方法仍持矛盾态度。在将肛门癌筛查纳入常规HIV护理之前,需要更多研究来解决医生的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号