...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
【24h】

Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

机译:公众对政府干预以改变与健康相关的行为的接受程度:系统的回顾和叙述性综合

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Governments can intervene to change health-related behaviours using various measures but are sensitive to public attitudes towards such interventions. This review describes public attitudes towards a range of policy interventions aimed at changing tobacco and alcohol use, diet, and physical activity, and the extent to which these attitudes vary with characteristics of (a) the targeted behaviour (b) the intervention and (c) the respondents. Methods We searched electronic databases and conducted a narrative synthesis of empirical studies that reported public attitudes in Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand towards interventions relating to tobacco, alcohol, diet and physical activity. Two hundred studies met the inclusion criteria. Results Over half the studies (105/200, 53%) were conducted in North America, with the most common interventions relating to tobacco control (110/200, 55%), followed by alcohol (42/200, 21%), diet-related interventions (18/200, 9%), interventions targeting both diet and physical activity (18/200, 9%), and physical activity alone (3/200, 2%). Most studies used survey-based methods (160/200, 80%), and only ten used experimental designs. Acceptability varied as a function of: (a) the targeted behaviour, with more support observed for smoking-related interventions; (b) the type of intervention, with less intrusive interventions, those already implemented, and those targeting children and young people attracting most support; and (c) the characteristics of respondents, with support being highest in those not engaging in the targeted behaviour, and with women and older respondents being more likely to endorse more restrictive measures. Conclusions Public acceptability of government interventions to change behaviour is greatest for the least intrusive interventions, which are often the least effective, and for interventions targeting the behaviour of others, rather than the respondent him or herself. Experimental studies are needed to assess how the presentation of the problem and the benefits of intervention might increase acceptability for those interventions which are more effective but currently less acceptable.
机译:背景政府可以采取各种措施干预改变与健康相关的行为,但对公众对此类干预的态度敏感。这篇评论描述了公众对旨在改变烟草和酒精使用,饮食和身体活动的一系列政策干预措施的态度,以及这些态度随(a)目标行为(b)干预措施和(c )受访者。方法我们搜索了电子数据库,并进行了经验研究的叙述性综合,这些研究报告了欧洲,北美,澳大利亚和新西兰对烟草,酒精,饮食和身体活动相关干预措施的公众态度。 200项研究符合纳入标准。结果超过一半的研究(105/200,53%)在北美进行,最常见的干预措施涉及烟草控制(110/200,55%),其次是酒精(42/200,21%),饮食相关干预措施(18/200,9%),针对饮食和身体活动的干预措施(18/200,9%)和仅身体活动的干预措施(3/200,2%)。大多数研究使用基于调查的方法(160/200,占80%),只有十个使用实验设计。可接受性随以下因素而变化:(a)目标行为,在与吸烟有关的干预措施中获得更多支持; (b)干预类型,干预措施较少,已经实施,针对儿童和年轻人的干预最受支持; (c)受访者的特征,在不从事目标行为的受访者中,支持率最高,而女性和年长的受访者更有可能赞同限制性更大的措施。结论结论对于干预程度最低的干预措施(通常效果最差)以及针对他人行为的干预措施(而非受访者本人),公众对改变行为的政府干预的接受程度最高。需要进行实验研究来评估问题的呈现方式和干预措施的收益如何提高这些干预措施的可接受性,这些干预措施更有效但目前尚不可接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号