首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A pre-and-post study of an urban renewal program in a socially disadvantaged neighbourhood in Sydney, Australia
【24h】

A pre-and-post study of an urban renewal program in a socially disadvantaged neighbourhood in Sydney, Australia

机译:在澳大利亚悉尼的一个处于社会弱势社区的城市更新计划的前后研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Urban renewal programs aim to target both the physical and social environments to improve the social capital, social connectedness, sense of community and economic conditions of residents of the neighbourhoods. We evaluated the impact of an urban renewal program on the health and well-being of residents of a socially disadvantaged community in south-western Sydney, Australia. Methods Pre- and post-urban renewal program surveys were conducted with householders by trained interviewers. The urban renewal program was conducted over 16?months and consisted of internal upgrades (including internal painting; replacement of kitchens, bathrooms and carpets; general maintenance), external upgrades (including property painting; new fencing, carports, letterboxes, concrete driveways, drainage and landscaping), general external maintenance, and social interventions such as community engagement activities, employment initiatives, and building a community meeting place. The questionnaire asked about demographic characteristics, self-reported physical activity, psychological distress, self-rated health, and perceptions of aesthetics, safety and walkability in the neighbourhood. We used the paired chi-square test (McNemars test) to compare paired proportions. A Bonferroni corrected p-value of Results Following the urban renewal program we did not find statistically significant changes in perceptions of aesthetics, safety and walkability in the neighbourhood. However, post-urban renewal, more householders reported there were attractive buildings and homes in their neighbourhood (18% vs 64%), felt that they belonged to the neighbourhood (48% vs 70%), that their area had a reputation for being a safe place (8% vs 27%), that they felt safe walking down their street after dark (52% vs 85%), and that people who came to live in the neighbourhood would be more likely to stay rather than move elsewhere (13% vs 54%). Changes in psychological distress and self-rated health were not statistically significant. Conclusions We found an increase, in the short-term, in the proportion of householders reporting improvements in some aspects of their immediate neighbourhood following the urban renewal program. It will be important to repeat the survey in the future to determine whether these positive changes are sustained.
机译:背景技术市区重建计划旨在针对物质和社会环境,以改善社区居民的社会资本,社会联系,社区意识和经济状况。我们评估了城市更新计划对澳大利亚西南悉尼社会弱势社区居民健康和福祉的影响。方法通过训练有素的访问员与住户进行城市更新之前和之后的计划调查。市区更新计划进行了16个月,包括内部升级(包括内部油漆;更换厨房,浴室和地毯;一般维护),外部升级(包括财产油漆;新围栏,车棚,信箱,混凝土车道,排水系统)和环境美化),一般的外部维护以及诸如社区参与活动,就业计划和建立社区聚会场所之类的社会干预措施。问卷调查了有关人口统计学特征,自我报告的体育活动,心理困扰,自我评估的健康状况以及邻里对美学,安全性和步行性的看法。我们使用配对卡方检验(McNemars检验)来比较配对比例。 Bonferroni校正的结果的p值在进行城市更新计划后,我们没有发现邻里的美学,安全性和步行性方面的统计显着变化。但是,在城市更新之后,更多的家庭报告说他们的邻里有有吸引力的建筑物和房屋(18%对64%),感到他们属于该邻里(48%对70%),他们所在的地区享有盛名一个安全的地方(8%对27%),天黑后他们可以安全地沿着街走(52%对85%),而且住在附近的人更有可能留下而不是搬到其他地方( 13%和54%)。心理困扰和自我评估的健康状况变化无统计学意义。结论我们发现,在短期内,在城市更新计划之后,报告其邻里某些方面有所改善的住户比例有所增加。将来重复进行调查以确定这些积极变化是否持续很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号