首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >The Big Drink Debate: perceptions of the impact of price on alcohol consumption from a large scale cross-sectional convenience survey in north west England
【24h】

The Big Drink Debate: perceptions of the impact of price on alcohol consumption from a large scale cross-sectional convenience survey in north west England

机译:大饮料辩论:在英格兰西北部进行的大规模横断面便利性调查,了解价格对酒精消费的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Background A large-scale survey was conducted in 2008 in north west England, a region with high levels of alcohol-related harm, during a regional 'Big Drink Debate' campaign. The aim of this paper is to explore perceptions of how alcohol consumption would change if alcohol prices were to increase or decrease. Methods A convenience survey of residents (≥ 18 years) of north west England measured demographics, income, alcohol consumption in previous week, and opinions on drinking behaviour under two pricing conditions: low prices and discounts and increased alcohol prices (either 'decrease', 'no change' or 'increase'). Multinomial logistic regression used three outcomes: 'completely elastic' (consider that lower prices increase drinking and higher prices decrease drinking); 'lower price elastic' (lower prices increase drinking, higher prices have no effect); and 'price inelastic' (no change for either). Results Of 22,780 drinkers surveyed, 80.3% considered lower alcohol prices and discounts would increase alcohol consumption, while 22.1% thought raising prices would decrease consumption, making lower price elasticity only (i.e. lower prices increase drinking, higher prices have no effect) the most common outcome (62%). Compared to a high income/high drinking category, the lightest drinkers with a low income (adjusted odds ratio AOR = 1.78, 95% confidence intervals CI 1.38-2.30) or medium income (AOR = 1.88, CI 1.47-2.41) were most likely to be lower price elastic. Females were more likely than males to be lower price elastic (65% vs 57%) while the reverse was true for complete elasticity (20% vs 26%, P Conclusions Lower pricing increases alcohol consumption, and the alcohol industry's continued focus on discounting sales encourages higher drinking levels. International evidence suggests increasing the price of alcohol reduces consumption, and one in five of the surveyed population agreed; more work is required to increase this agreement to achieve public support for policy change. Such policy should also recognise that alcohol is an addictive drug, and the population may be prepared to pay more to drink the amount they now feel they need.
机译:背景技术2008年,在英格兰的西北部地区进行了一次大规模调查,该地区是与酒精有关的危害最严重的地区,在区域“大饮酒辩论”运动中。本文的目的是探讨人们对如果酒精价格上涨或下跌会改变酒精消费的看法。方法对英格兰西北部(≥18岁)居民进行的便利性调查在以下两种定价条件下测量了人口统计,收入,前一周的饮酒量以及对饮酒行为的看法:低价和打折以及酒精价格上涨(“下降”, “不变”或“增加”)。多项式逻辑回归使用三个结果:“完全弹性”(考虑较低的价格会增加饮酒,而较高的价格会减少饮酒); “降低价格弹性”(降低价格会增加饮酒,提高价格没有影响);和“价格无弹性”(两者均不变)。结果在接受调查的22780名饮酒者中,有80.3%的人认为较低的酒精价格和打折会增加酒精的消费,而22.1%的人认为提高价格会减少酒精的消费,这仅是较低的价格弹性(即较低的价格会增加饮酒,较高的价格没有影响)最为常见。结果(62%)。与高收入/高饮酒类别相比,最有可能出现低收入(调整比值比AOR = 1.78,95%置信区间CI 1.38-2.30)或中等收入(AOR = 1.88,CI 1.47-2.41)降低价格弹性。女性比男性更有可能降低价格弹性(65%比57%),而完全弹性则相反(20%比26%,P)结论较低的价格会增加酒精消费,并且酒精行业继续关注折扣销售鼓励提高饮酒水平。国际证据表明,提高酒精价格会减少消费,五分之一的被调查人口表示同意;需要更多的工作来增加此协议,以获取公众对政策变化的支持。这种令人上瘾的药物,因此人们可能愿意支付更多的钱来喝他们现在认为需要的量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号