首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Excess healthcare burden during 1918-1920 influenza pandemic in Taiwan: implications for post-pandemic preparedness
【24h】

Excess healthcare burden during 1918-1920 influenza pandemic in Taiwan: implications for post-pandemic preparedness

机译:台湾1918-1920年流感大流行期间医疗保健负担过重:对大流行后的准备工作的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Background It is speculated that the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus might fall into a seasonal pattern during the current post-pandemic period with more severe clinical presentation for high-risk groups identified during the 2009 pandemic. Hence the extent of likely excess healthcare needs during this period must be fully considered. We will make use of the historical healthcare record in Taiwan during and after the 1918 influenza pandemic to ascertain the scope of potential excess healthcare burden during the post-pandemic period. Methods To establish the healthcare needs after the initial wave in 1918, the yearly healthcare records (hospitalizations, outpatients, etc.) in Taiwan during 1918-1920 are compared with the corresponding data from the adjacent "baseline" years of 1916, 1917, 1921, and 1922 to estimate the excess healthcare burden during the initial outbreak in 1918 and in the years immediately after. Results In 1918 the number of public hospital outpatients exceeded the yearly average of the baseline years by 20.11% (95% CI: 16.43, 25.90), and the number of hospitalizations exceeded the corresponding yearly average of the baseline years by 12.20% (10.59, 14.38), while the excess number of patients treated by the public medics was statistically significant at 32.21% (28.48, 39.82) more than the yearly average of the baseline years. For 1920, only the excess number of hospitalizations was statistically significant at 19.83% (95% CI: 17.21, 23.38) more than the yearly average of the baseline years. Conclusions Considerable extra burden with significant loss of lives was reported in 1918 by both the public medics system and the public hospitals. In comparison, only a substantial number of excess hospitalizations in the public hospitals was reported in 1920, indicating that the population was relatively unprepared for the first wave in 1918 and did not fully utilize the public hospitals. Moreover, comparatively low mortality was reported by the public hospitals and the public medics during the second wave in 1920 even though significantly more patients were hospitalized, suggesting that there had been substantially less fatal illnesses among the hospitalized patients during the second wave. Our results provide viable parameters for assessing healthcare needs for post-pandemic preparedness.
机译:背景推测在当前的大流行后时期,2009年大流行的H1N1流感病毒可能会进入季节性模式,对于在2009年大流行期间识别出的高风险人群,其临床表现更为严重。因此,在此期间可能需要过多的医疗保健需求的程度必须得到充分考虑。我们将利用1918年流感大流行期间和之后在台湾的历史医疗记录,来确定大流行后时期潜在的超额医疗负担范围。方法为了确定1918年初期浪潮之后的医疗保健需求,将1918-1920年期间台湾的年度医疗保健记录(住院,门诊等)与相邻的1916、1917、1921年“基准”年的相应数据进行比较和1922年,以估算1918年初次爆发以及随后几年的医疗负担。结果1918年,公立医院的门诊病人数比基准年的年平均数高出20.11%(95%CI:16.43,25.90),住院人数比基准年的年平均数高出12.20%(10.59, 14.38),而由公共医生治疗的患者人数超出基准年的年平均数在统计学上具有显着意义,为32.21%(28.48,39.82)。在1920年,仅住院的额外人数在统计学上比基线年的年平均数多了19.83%(95%CI:17.21,23.38)。结论1918年,公共医疗系统和公立医院都报告了相当大的额外负担,造成了重大生命损失。相比之下,1920年仅报告了公立医院中大量过剩的住院情况,这表明1918年的第一波居民相对没有做好准备,也没有充分利用公立医院。而且,1920年第二波期间的公立医院和公共医务人员报告了相对较低的死亡率,尽管住院的患者明显增加,这表明第二波期间住院的患者中的致命疾病显着减少。我们的结果为评估大流行后防范的医疗需求提供了可行的参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号