Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study

Parames Khalechelvam; Kenneth K H Lo; Wilson W S Tam

首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study

【24h】

Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study

机译：认可PRISMA声明以及在护理期刊上发表的系统评价和荟萃分析的质量：一项横断面研究

获取原文

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Abstract Objective Systematic reviews (SRs) often poorly report key information, thereby diminishing their usefulness. Previous studies evaluated published SRs and determined that they failed to meet explicit criteria or characteristics. The Preferred Rep

机译：摘要目的系统评价（SR）经常无法很好地报告关键信息，从而降低了其有用性。先前的研究评估了已发布的SR，并确定它们不符合明确的标准或特征。首选代表

著录项

来源
《BMJ Open》 |2017年第2期|共页
作者
Parames Khalechelvam; Kenneth K H Lo; Wilson W S Tam;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类临床医学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: Have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? (Radiology (2013) 269, 2, (413-426)) [J] . Radiology . 2014,第1期

机译：研究质量与报告完整性的关联：自PRISMA声明发表以来，报告的完整性以及主要放射学期刊中系统评价和荟萃分析的质量是否发生了变化？（放射学（2013）269，2，（413-426））
2. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: Have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? [J] . TunisA.S., McInnesM.D.F., HannaR., Radiology . 2013,第2期

机译：研究质量与报告完整性的关联：自PRISMA声明发表以来，报告的完整性以及主要放射学期刊中系统评价和荟萃分析的质量是否发生了变化？
3. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: Have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? [J] . TunisA.S., McInnesM.D.F., HannaR., Radiology . 2013,第2期

机译：报告完整性的学习质量协会：自普斯马达声明出版以来，在主要放射学期刊中有完整的报告和质量的完整性，以来，在主要放射学期刊中发生变化？
4. Education and training of acupuncture providers affect the results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses [C] . 2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops . 2010

机译：针灸师的教育和培训会影响系统评价和荟萃分析的结果
5. Enhancing the Understanding of Integration in Mixed Methods Research by Reviewing Integration Strategies in Published Journal Articles: A Systematic Review [D] . Zhou, Yi. 2020

机译：通过审查公布期刊文章中的整合策略，提高对混合方法研究的整合的理解：系统审查
6. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study [O] . Wilson W S Tam, Kenneth K H Lo, Parames Khalechelvam 2017

机译：认可PRISMA声明以及在护理期刊上发表的系统评价和荟萃分析的质量：一项横断面研究
7. Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey [O] . Wilson W S Tam, Arthur Tang, Brigitte Woo, 2019

机译：对系统评审和Meta-Analys的首选报告项目（Prisma）作者发表审查中的审查：在护理期刊上的审查：横断面在线调查

Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅