...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study
【24h】

Doctors’ approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study

机译:医生在基本医疗保健中进行PSA测试和过度诊断的方法:定性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives (1) To explain general practitioners’ (GPs’) approaches to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and overdiagnosis; (2) to explain how GPs reason about their PSA testing routines and (3) to explain how these routines influence GPs’ personal experience as clinicians. Setting Primary care practices in Australia including men's health clinics and rural practices with variable access to urology services. Participants 32 urban and rural GPs within Australia. We included GPs of varying ages, gender (11 female), clinical experience and patient populations. All GPs interested in participating in the study were included. Primary and secondary outcome measure(s) Data were analysed using grounded theory methods to determine how and why GPs provide (or do not provide) PSA testing to their asymptomatic male patients. Results We observed patterned variation in GP practice, and identified four heuristics to describe GP preference for, and approaches to, PSA testing and overdiagnosis: (1) GPs who prioritised avoiding underdiagnosis, (2) GPs who weighed underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis case by case, (3) GPs who prioritised avoiding overdiagnosis and (4) GPs who did not engage with overdiagnosis at all. The heuristics guided GPs’ Routine Practice (usual testing, communication and responses to patient request). The heuristics also reflected GPs’ different Practice Rationales (drawing on experience, medicolegal obligations, guidelines and evidence) and produced different Practice Outcomes (GPs’ experiences of the consequences of their PSA testing decisions). Some of these heuristics were more responsive to patient preferences than others. Conclusions Variation in GPs’ PSA testing practices is strongly related to their approach to overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of prostate cancer. Men receive very different care depending on their GP's reasoning and practice preferences. Future policy to address overdiagnosis will be more likely to succeed if it responds to these patterned variations.
机译:目标(1)解释全科医生(GPs)进行前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测试和过度诊断的方法; (2)解释GP如何制定其PSA测试程序的理由,以及(3)解释这些程序如何影响GP作为临床医生的个人经历。在澳大利亚设置初级保健实践,包括男性保健诊所和农村实践,以及获得泌尿科服务的机会可变。参与者澳大利亚境内的32个城市和乡村GP。我们纳入了不同年龄,性别(11位女性),临床经验和患者人群的GP。包括所有有兴趣参加研究的全科医生。主要和次要结局指标使用扎实的理论方法分析数据,以确定全科医生如何以及为何向无症状男性患者提供(或不提供)PSA检测。结果我们观察了GP实践中的模式差异,并确定了四种启发式方法来描述GP对PSA测试和过度诊断的偏爱和方法:(1)优先考虑避免诊断不足的GP;(2)逐案权衡诊断不足和过度诊断的GP; (3)优先考虑避免过度诊断的GP和(4)完全不进行过度诊断的GP。启发式指导GP的常规实践(通常的测试,沟通和对患者要求的回应)。启发式方法还反映了GP的不同实践原理(借鉴经验,法医学义务,指南和证据),并产生了不同的实践成果(GP对PSA测试决策后果的经验)。这些启发式方法中的某些比其他启发式对患者的偏好更敏感。结论GP的PSA测试方法的差异与他们对前列腺癌的过度诊断和诊断不足的方法密切相关。男性根据全科医生的推理和实践偏爱而受到的照顾大相径庭。如果应对这些模式变化,将来解决过度诊断的政策将更有可能成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号