首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led internet-based vascular risk factor management programme: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled clinical trial
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led internet-based vascular risk factor management programme: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled clinical trial

机译:由护士主导的基于互联网的血管危险因素管理计划的成本效益:经济评估以及随机对照临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To assess the cost-effectiveness of an internet-based, nurse-led vascular risk factor management programme in addition to usual care compared with usual care alone in patients with a clinical manifestation of a vascular disease. Design Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial (the Internet-based vascular Risk factor Intervention and Self-management (IRIS) study). Setting Multicentre trial in a secondary and tertiary healthcare setting. Participants 330 patients with a recent clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis in the coronary, cerebral, or peripheral arteries and with ≥2 treatable vascular risk factors not at goal. Intervention The intervention consisted of a personalised website with an overview and actual status of patients’ vascular risk factors, and mail communication with a nurse practitioner via the website for 12?months. The intervention combined self-management support, monitoring of disease control and pharmacotherapy. Main outcome measures Societal costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness. Results Patients experienced equal health benefits, that is, 0.86 vs 0.85 QALY (intervention vs usual care) at 1?year. Adjusting for baseline differences, the incremental QALY difference was ?0.014 (95% CI ?0.034 to 0.007). The intervention was associated with lower total costs (€4859 vs €5078, difference €219, 95% CI ?€2301 to €1825). The probability that the intervention is cost-effective at a threshold value of €20?000/QALY, is 65%. At mean annual cost of €220 per patient, the intervention is relatively cheap. Conclusions An internet-based, nurse-led intervention in addition to usual care to improve vascular risk factors in patients with a clinical manifestation of a vascular disease does not result in a QALY gain at 1?year, but has a small effect on vascular risk factors and is associated with lower costs. Trial registration number NCT00785031.
机译:目的评估与常规护理相比,基于互联网的由护士主导的血管危险因素管理计划的成本效益,该计划与常规护理相比,具有血管疾病的临床表现。设计成本效益分析以及一项随机对照试验(基于互联网的血管危险因素干预和自我管理(IRIS)研究)。在二级和三级医疗机构中设置“多中心”试验。参与者330例近期在冠状动脉,脑或外周动脉中出现动脉粥样硬化的临床表现,且目标≥2个可治疗的血管危险因素的患者。干预措施干预措施包括一个个性化的网站,其中概述了患者血管危险因素的概况和实际状况,并通过该网站与护士从业人员进行为期12个月的邮件交流。干预措施结合了自我管理支持,疾病控制监测和药物治疗。主要结果指标社会成本,质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益。结果患者在1年时获得了相同的健康益处,即QALY为0.86 vs 0.85(干预vs常规护理)。调整基线差异后,增加的QALY差异约为0.014(95%CI约为0.034至0.007)。干预与降低总成本相关(4859欧元对5078欧元,相差219欧元,95%CI – 2301欧元至1825欧元)。在€20?000 / QALY的阈值下,干预具有成本效益的可能性为65%。以每位患者每年220欧元的平均费用,该干预措施相对便宜。结论除了常规护理以外,基于互联网的,由护士主导的干预措施可改善具有血管疾病临床表现的患者的血管危险因素,但不会导致1年的QALY增加,但对血管风险的影响很小因素并降低成本。试用注册号NCT00785031。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号