首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelines
【24h】

Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelines

机译:老年人居住设施集群随机试验中的同意程序:对报告做法和拟议指南的系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To assess the quality of reported consent processes of cluster-randomised trials conducted in residential facilities for older people and to explore whether the focus on improving the general conduct and reporting of cluster-randomised trials influenced the quality of conduct and reporting of ethical processes in these trials. Design Systematic review of cluster-randomised trials reports, published up to the end of 2010. Data sources National Library of Medicine (Medline) via PubMed, hand-searches of BMJ, Journal of the American Medical Association, BMC Health Services Research, Age and Ageing and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, reference search in Web of Knowledge and consultation with experts. Eligibility for selecting studies Published cluster-randomised trials where the unit of randomisation is a part or the whole of a residential facility for older people, without language or year of publication restrictions. Results We included 73 trials. Authors reported ethical approval in 59, obtaining individual consent in 51, and using proxies for this consent in 37, but the process to assess residents’ capacity to consent was clearly reported in only eight. We rated only six trials high for the quality of consent processes. We considered that individual informed consent could have been waived legitimately in 14? of 22 trials not reporting obtaining consent. The proportions reporting ethical approval and quality of consent processes were higher in recent trials. Conclusions Recently published international recommendations regarding ethical conduct in cluster-randomised trials are much needed. In relation to consent processes when cognitively impaired individuals are included in these trials, we provide a six-point checklist and recommend the minimum information to be reported. Those who lack capacity in trials with complex designs should be afforded the same care in relation to consent as competent adults in trials with simpler designs.
机译:目的评估在老年人居住设施中进行的集群随机试验的报告同意过程的质量,并探讨对改善总体行为和集群随机试验报告的关注是否影响行为的质量和伦理过程的报告。这些审判。集群随机试验报告的设计系统综述,发布至2010年底。数据来源通过PubMed获得国家医学图书馆(Medline),BMJ的人工搜索,《美国医学会杂志》,BMC Health Services Research,Age and 《美国老年病学杂志》(Aging)和《美国老年病学杂志》(Aging and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society),在Web of Knowledge中进行参考搜索以及与专家进行磋商。选择研究的资格已发布的整群随机试验,其中随机单位是老年人居住设施的一部分或全部,没有语言或出版年份的限制。结果我们纳入了73个试验。作者在59个国家中报告了伦理批准,在51个国家中获得了个人同意,在37个国家中使用了代理人的同意书,但是只有8个国家明确报告了评估居民同意能力的过程。对于同意流程的质量,我们仅将六项试验评为高。我们认为,个人知情同意书本可以在14年内合法放弃吗?未报告获得同意的22个试验中。在最近的试验中,报告伦理批准和同意过程质量的比例更高。结论迫切需要最近发表的有关聚类随机试验中道德行为的国际建议。关于将认知障碍者纳入这些试验的同意过程,我们提供六点清单,并建议报告的最低限度信息。那些在复杂设计试验中缺乏能力的人,应在设计简单的试验中获得与有能力的成年人相同的同情关怀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号