...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:校本吸烟预防课程的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Objective To assess effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula keeping children never-smokers. Design Systematic review, meta-analysis. Data: MEDLINE (1966+), EMBASE (1974+), Cinahl, PsycINFO (1967+), ERIC (1982+), Cochrane CENTRAL, Health Star, Dissertation Abstracts, conference proceedings. Data synthesis: pooled analyses, fixed-effects models, adjusted ORs. Risk of bias assessed with Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Setting 50 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of school-based smoking curricula. Participants Never-smokers age 5–18 (n=143?495); follow-up ≥6?months; all countries; no date/language limitations. Interventions Information, social influences, social competence, combined social influences/competence and multimodal curricula. Outcome measure Remaining a never-smoker at follow-up. Results Pooling all curricula, trials with follow-up ≤1?year showed no statistically significant differences compared with controls (OR 0.91 (0.82 to 1.01)), though trials of combined social competence/social influences curricula had a significant effect on smoking prevention (7 trials, OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.85)). Pooling all trials with longest follow-up showed an overall significant effect in favour of the interventions (OR 0.88 (0.82 to 0.95)), as did the social competence (OR 0.65 (0.43 to 0.96)) and combined social competence/social influences curricula (OR 0.60 (0.43 to 0.83)). No effect for information, social influences or multimodal curricula. Principal findings were not sensitive to inclusion of booster sessions in curricula or to whether they were peer-led or adult-led. Differentiation into tobacco-only or multifocal curricula had a similar effect on the primary findings. Few trials assessed outcomes by gender: there were significant effects for females at both follow-up periods, but not for males. Conclusions RCTs of baseline never-smokers at longest follow-up found an overall significant effect with average 12% reduction in starting smoking compared with controls, but no effect for all trials pooled at ≤1?year. However, combined social competence/social influences curricula showed a significant effect at both follow-up periods. Systematic review registration Cochrane Tobacco Review Group CD001293.
机译:目的评估学校预防吸烟课程保持儿童不吸烟的有效性。设计系统的审查,荟萃分析。数据:MEDLINE(1966 +),EMBASE(1974 +),Cinahl,PsycINFO(1967 +),ERIC(1982 +),Cochrane CENTRAL,健康之星,学位论文摘要,会议记录。数据综合:汇总分析,固定效果模型,调整后的OR。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。制定50项基于学校的吸烟课程的随机对照试验(RCT)。参与者5至18岁的不吸烟者(n = 143?495);随访≥6个月所有国家;没有日期/语言限制。干预措施信息,社会影响力,社会能力,综合社会影响力/能力和多模式课程。成果衡量指标在随访中保持不吸烟者的状态。结果汇总所有课程,随访≤1年的试验与对照组相比无统计学差异(OR 0.91(0.82至1.01)),尽管结合社会能力/社会影响课程的试验对预防吸烟有显着影响( 7个试验,或0.59(95%CI 0.41至0.85)。汇总所有随访时间最长的试验,表明干预措施总体上具有显着效果(OR 0.88(0.82至0.95)),社会能力(OR 0.65(0.43至0.96))以及社会能力/社会影响综合课程(或0.60(0.43至0.83))。对于信息,社会影响或多模式课程没有影响。主要发现对在课程中纳入强化课程或由同伴主导或成人主导不敏感。区分为仅烟草课程或多焦点课程对主要发现有相似的影响。很少有试验按性别评估结果:在两个随访期中,对女性都有显着影响,而对男性则没有。结论随访时间最长的基线从不吸烟者的RCT发现总体上有显着效果,与对照组相比,平均开始吸烟减少了12%,但所有≤1年的试验均无效果。但是,综合的社会能力/社会影响力课程在两个后续阶段均显示出显着效果。系统的审查注册Cochrane烟草审查小组CD001293。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号