首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review
【24h】

The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review

机译:胸部超声对住院成人急性呼吸衰竭的CT影像学检查巩固的诊断准确性:系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives (1) Summarise chest ultrasound accuracy to diagnose radiological consolidation, referenced to chest CT in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). (2) Directly compared ultrasound with chest X-ray. Setting Hospitalised patients. Participants Studies were eligible if adult participants in respiratory failure underwent chest ultrasound to diagnose consolidation referenced to CT. Exclusion: (1) not primary study, (2) not respiratory failure, (3) not chest ultrasound, (4) not consolidation, (5) translation unobtainable, (6) unable to extract data, (7) unable to obtain paper. 4 studies comprising 224 participants met inclusion. Outcome measures As planned, paired forest plots display 95% CIs of sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound and chest X-ray. Sensitivity and specificity from each study are plotted in receiver operator characteristics space. Meta-analysis was planned if studies were sufficiently homogeneous and numerous (≥4). Although this numerical requirement was met, meta-analysis was prevented by heterogeneous units of analysis between studies. Results All studies were in intensive care, with either a high risk of selection bias or high applicability concerns. Studies had unclear or high risk of bias related to use of ultrasound. Only 1 study clearly performed ultrasound within 24?h of respiratory failure diagnosis. Ultrasound sensitivity ranged from 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) to 1.00 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.00). Specificity ranged from 0.78 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.94) to 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00). In two studies, chest X-ray had lower sensitivity than ultrasound, but there were insufficient patients to compare specificity. Conclusions Four small studies suggest ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific for consolidation in ARF, but high risk of bias and concerns about applicability in all studies may have inflated diagnostic accuracy. Further robustly designed studies are needed to define the role of ultrasound in this setting. Trial registration number http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (CRD42013006472).
机译:目的(1)总结胸部超声检查诊断放射线巩固的准确性,参考急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者的胸部CT。 (2)直接将超声与胸部X线进行比较。设置住院患者。如果成年呼吸衰竭的参与者接受了胸部超声检查以参考CT进行巩固,则该研究合格。排除:(1)不是初级研究,(2)不是呼吸衰竭,(3)不是胸部超声检查,(4)没有合并,(5)无法获得翻译,(6)无法提取数据,(7)无法获取论文。包括224名参与者的4项研究被纳入。成果措施按计划,成对的林地显示出对超声和胸部X射线敏感性和特异性的95%CI。每个研究的敏感性和特异性都绘制在接收者操作者特征空间中。如果研究足够均匀且数量众多(≥4),则计划进行荟萃分析。尽管满足了此数字要求,但研究之间的异质分析单元阻止了荟萃分析。结果所有研究都在重症监护中,存在选择偏倚的高风险或高度的适用性问题。研究尚不清楚或与使用超声波有关的偏倚风险很高。只有1个研究在呼吸衰竭诊断后24小时内清楚地进行了超声检查。超声灵敏度范围从0.91(95%CI 0.95至1.00)到1.00(95%CI 0.95至1.00)。特异性范围为0.78(95%CI 0.52至0.94)至1.00(0.99至1.00)。在两项研究中,胸部X射线的敏感性低于超声检查,但没有足够的患者比较特异性。结论四项小型研究表明,超声对ARF中的合并症具有高度敏感性和特异性,但是在所有研究中偏倚风险高以及对适用性的担忧可能会提高诊断准确性。需要进一步的稳健设计研究来确定超声在这种情况下的作用。试用注册号http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/(CRD42013006472)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号