...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Group Medical Visits (GMVs) in primary care: an RCT of group-based versus individual appointments to reduce HbA1c in older people
【24h】

Group Medical Visits (GMVs) in primary care: an RCT of group-based versus individual appointments to reduce HbA1c in older people

机译:初级保健中的团体医疗就诊(GMV):基于团体与个人的RCT,以减少老年人中的HbA1c

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects more than 1.1 million Canadians aged ≥65?years. Group Medical Visits are an emerging health service delivery method. Recent systematic reviews show that they can significantly reduce glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, but Group Visits have not been evaluated within primary care. We intend to determine the clinical effectiveness, quality of life and economic implications of Group Medical Visits within a primary care setting for older people with T2DM. Methods and analysis A 2-year proof-of-concept, single-blinded (measurement team) randomised control trial to test the efficacy of Group Medical Visits in an urban Canadian primary care setting. Participants ≥65?years old with T2DM (N=128) will be equally randomised to either eight groups of eight patients each (Group Medical Visits; Intervention) or to Individual visits (Standard Care; Controls). Those administering cointerventions are not blinded to group assignment. Our sample size is based on estimates of variance (±1.4% for HbA1c) and effect size (0.9/1.4=0.6) from the literature and from our own preliminary data. Forty participants per group will provide a β likelihood of 0.80, assuming an α of 0.05. A conservative estimation of an effect size of 0.7/1.4 changes the N in the power calculation to 59 per group. Hence, we aim to enrol 64 participants in each study arm. We will use intention-to-treat analysis and compare mean HbA1c (% glycosylated HbA1c) (primary outcome) of Intervention/Control participants at 12?months, 24?months and 1?year postintervention on selected clinical, patient-rated and economic measures. Trial registration number NCT02002143.
机译:简介2型糖尿病(T2DM)影响超过110万≥65岁的加拿大人。团体医疗就诊是一种新兴的医疗服务提供方法。最近的系统评价显示,它们可以显着降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的水平,但尚未在基层医疗中评估小组就诊。我们打算确定在针对T2DM老年人的初级保健环境中进行团体医疗就诊的临床有效性,生活质量和经济意义。方法和分析一项为期2年的概念验证,单盲(测量小组)随机对照试验,以测试在加拿大城市初级保健机构中进行团体医疗就诊的效果。 ≥65岁且患有T2DM(N = 128)的参与者将被随机分为8组,每组8位患者(团体医疗访问;干预)或个人访问(标准护理;对照)。那些进行共同干预的人不会盲目地进行小组分配。我们的样本量是基于文献和我们自己的初步数据得出的方差(HbA1c为±1.4%)和效应量(0.9 / 1.4 = 0.6)的估计值。假设α为0.05,则每组40名参与者的β可能性为0.80。保守估计效应大小为0.7 / 1.4,会将功效计算中的N更改为每组59。因此,我们的目标是每个研究小组招募64名参与者。我们将进行意向性治疗分析,并比较干预/对照参与者在干预后12个月,24个月和1年时的平均HbA1c(%糖基化HbA1c)(主要结局)的选择临床,患者评分和经济指标。试用注册号NCT02002143。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号