...
首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >European Working Time Directive and doctors’ health: a systematic review of the available epidemiological evidence
【24h】

European Working Time Directive and doctors’ health: a systematic review of the available epidemiological evidence

机译:欧洲工作时间指令和医生的健康:对现有流行病学证据的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To summarise the available scientific evidence on the health effects of exposure to working beyond the limit number of hours established by the European Working Time Directive (EWTD) on physicians. Design A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE. Study selection, quality appraisal and data extraction were carried out by independent pairs of researchers using pre-established criteria. Setting Physicians of any medical, surgical or community specialty, working in any possible setting (hospitals, primary healthcare, etc), as well as trainees, residents, junior house officers or postgraduate interns, were included. Participants The total number of participants was 14?338. Primary and secondary outcome measures Health effects classified under the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Results Over 3000 citations and 110 full articles were reviewed. From these, 11 studies of high or intermediate quality carried out in North America, Europe and Japan met the inclusion criteria. Six studies included medical residents, junior doctors or house officers and the five others included medical specialists or consultants, medical, dental, and general practitioners and hospital physicians. Evidence of an association was found between percutaneous injuries and road traffic accidents with extended long working hours (LWH)/days or very LWH/weeks. The evidence was insufficient for mood disorders and general health. No studies on other health outcomes were identified. Conclusions LWH could increase the risk of percutaneous injuries and road traffic accidents, and possibly other incidents at work through the same pathway. While associations are clear, the existing evidence does not allow for an established causal or ‘dose–response’ relationship between LWH and incidents at work, or for a threshold number of extended hours above which there is a significantly higher risk and the hours physicians could work and remain safe and healthy. Policymakers should consider safety issues when working on relaxing EWTD for doctors.
机译:目的总结关于超出欧洲工作时间指令(EWTD)对医生的限制小时数的工作暴露对健康的影响的现有科学证据。设计在PubMed和EMBASE中进行了系统的文献检索。独立的研究人员对使用预先确定的标准进行研究选择,质量评估和数据提取。包括在任何可能的环境(医院,初级卫生保健等)中工作的任何医学,外科或社区专科医师,以及受训人员,居民,初级民政人员或研究生实习生。参加者参加者总数为14?338。主要和次要结果指标归类于国际疾病分类(ICD-10)的健康影响。结果审查了3000余篇文献和110篇完整文章。从中,在北美,欧洲和日本进行的11项高质量或中等质量研究符合纳入标准。六项研究包括住院医师,初级医生或内务干部,其他五项研究包括医学专家或顾问,医学,牙科和全科医生以及医院医师。在经皮损伤与道路交通事故之间存在关联的证据表明,长时间工作时间(LWH)/天或很长的LWH /周延长。证据不足以解决情绪障碍和一般健康问题。没有发现其他健康结果的研究。结论LWH可能增加经皮伤害和道路交通事故的风险,并可能增加通过同一途径在工作中发生的其他事故的风险。虽然关联很明确,但现有证据不允许在LWH与工作中的事件之间建立因果关系或“剂量-反应”关系,也不允许长期工作的阈值数量,如果超过此阈值,则存在明显更高的风险,而医生可以工作并保持安全健康。决策者在为医生放松EWTD时应考虑安全问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号