首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis
【24h】

Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis

机译:澳洲恶性胸腔积液试验(AMPLE):一项多中心随机研究,比较了留置胸膜导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Malignant pleural effusion can complicate most cancers. It causes breathlessness and requires hospitalisation for invasive pleural drainages. Malignant effusions often herald advanced cancers and limited prognosis. Minimising time spent in hospital is of high priority to patients and their families. Various treatment strategies exist for the management of malignant effusions, though there is no consensus governing the best choice. Talc pleurodesis is the conventional management but requires hospitalisation (and substantial healthcare resources), can cause significant side effects, and has a suboptimal success rate. Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) allow ambulatory fluid drainage without hospitalisation, and are increasingly employed for management of malignant effusions. Previous studies have only investigated the length of hospital care immediately related to IPC insertion. Whether IPC management reduces time spent in hospital in the patients’ remaining lifespan is unknown. A strategy of malignant effusion management that reduces hospital admission days will allow patients to spend more time outside hospital, reduce costs and save healthcare resources. Methods and analysis The Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial is a multicentred, randomised trial designed to compare IPC with talc pleurodesis for the management of malignant pleural effusion. This study will randomise 146 adults with malignant pleural effusions (1:1) to IPC management or talc slurry pleurodesis. The primary end point is the total number of days spent in hospital (for any admissions) from treatment procedure to death or end of study follow-up. Secondary end points include hospital days specific to pleural effusion management, adverse events, self-reported symptom and quality-of-life scores. Ethics and dissemination The Sir Charles Gairdner Group Human Research Ethics Committee has approved the study as have the ethics boards of all the participating hospitals. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. Trial registration numbers Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry—ACTRN12611000567921; National Institutes of Health—NCT02045121.
机译:引言恶性胸腔积液可使大多数癌症复杂化。它会导致呼吸困难,需要住院进行有创胸膜引流。恶性积液通常预示着晚期癌症和有限的预后。减少住院时间是患者及其家人的当务之急。尽管尚无共识来控制最佳选择,但存在各种治疗恶性积液的治疗策略。滑石粉胸膜固定术是常规治疗,但需要住院治疗(和大量的医疗资源),会引起严重的副作用,并且成功率不佳。留置胸膜导管(IPC)无需住院即可进行不卧床引流,并且越来越多地用于处理恶性积液。先前的研究仅调查了与IPC插入直接相关的医院护理时间。 IPC管理是否可以减少患者剩余寿命的住院时间尚不清楚。减少住院时间的恶性积液管理策略将使患者能够在医院外花费更多的时间,降低成本并节省医疗资源。方法和分析澳洲恶性胸腔积液(AMPLE)试验是一项多中心,随机试验,旨在比较IPC与滑石胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液。这项研究将146名成人恶性胸腔积液(1:1)随机分配至IPC管理或滑石浆胸膜固定术。主要终点是从治疗程序到死亡或研究随访结束的住院天数(所有入院时间)。次要终点包括特定于胸腔积液管理的住院天数,不良事件,自我报告的症状和生活质量评分。伦理与传播查尔斯·盖尔德纳爵士集团人类研究伦理委员会已经批准了这项研究,所有参与医院的伦理委员会也已批准该研究。试验结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上,并在科学会议上发表。试验注册号澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心—ACTRN12611000567921;美国国立卫生研究院-NCT02045121。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号