首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >Protocol for economic evaluation alongside a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a psychoeducational intervention for the primary prevention of postnatal mental health problems in first-time mothers
【24h】

Protocol for economic evaluation alongside a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a psychoeducational intervention for the primary prevention of postnatal mental health problems in first-time mothers

机译:经济评估协议以及一项针对初生母亲的产后精神健康问题的一级预防的心理教育干预措施的整群随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Postnatal mental health problems, which are an international public health priority, are a suitable target for preventive approaches. The financial burden of these disorders is borne across sectors in society, including health, early childhood, education, justice and the workforce. This paper describes the planned economic evaluation of What Were We Thinking, a psychoeducational intervention for the prevention of postnatal mental health problems in first-time mothers. Methods and analysis The evaluation will be conducted alongside a cluster-randomised controlled trial of its clinical effectiveness. Cost-effectiveness and costs-utility analyses will be conducted, resulting in estimates of cost per percentage point reduction in combined 30-day prevalence of depression, anxiety and adjustment disorders and cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. Uncertainty surrounding these estimates will be addressed using non-parametric bootstrapping and represented using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Additional cost analyses relevant for implementation will also be conducted. Modelling will be employed to estimate longer term cost-effectiveness if the intervention is found to be clinically effective during the period of the trial. Ethics and dissemination Approval to conduct the study was granted by the Southern Health (now Monash Health) Human Research Ethics Committee (24 April 2013; 11388B). The study was registered with the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (30 April 2013; CF12/1022-2012000474). The Education and Policy Research Committee, Victorian Government Department of Education and Early Childhood Development approved the study (22 March 2012; 2012_001472). Use of the EuroQol was registered with the EuroQol Group; 16 August 2012. Trial registration number The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 7 May 2012 (registration number ACTRN12613000506796).
机译:引言产后心理健康问题是国际公共卫生的优先重点,是预防方法的合适目标。这些疾病的经济负担由社会各部门承担,包括健康,幼儿,教育,司法和劳动力。本文描述了“我们在想什么”的计划经济评估,这是一种预防初生妈妈的产后心理健康问题的心理教育干预措施。方法和分析该评估将与一项关于其临床有效性的整群随机对照试验一起进行。将进行成本效益和成本效用分析,从而得出抑郁,焦虑和适应障碍综合患病率30天的每降低一个百分点的成本,以及获得的每质量调整生命年的成本。这些估计的不确定性将通过非参数自举法解决,并通过成本效益可接受性曲线来表示。还将进行与实施有关的其他成本分析。如果在试验期间发现干预措施在临床上是有效的,则将采用模型来评估长期成本效益。伦理学和传播进行这项研究的研究得到了南方健康(现为Monash Health)人类研究伦理委员会的批准(2013年4月24日; 11388B)。该研究已在莫纳什大学人类研究伦理委员会注册(2013年4月30日; CF12 / 1022-2012000474)。维多利亚州政府教育和幼儿发展部教育与政策研究委员会批准了该研究(2012年3月22日; 2012_001472)。 EuroQol的使用已在EuroQol集团注册。 2012年8月16日。试验注册号该试验已于2012年5月7日在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(注册号ACTRN12613000506796)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号