首页> 外文期刊>BMJ Open >How often do US-based human subjects research studies register on time, and how often do they post their results? A statistical analysis of the Clinicaltrials.gov database
【24h】

How often do US-based human subjects research studies register on time, and how often do they post their results? A statistical analysis of the Clinicaltrials.gov database

机译:美国的人体研究研究多久按时注册一次,他们多久发布一次结果?对Clinicaltrials.gov数据库的统计分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Context The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA) and the FDA Amendment Act of 2007 (FDAAA), respectively, established mandates for registration of interventional human research studies on the website clinicaltrials.gov (CTG) and for posting of results of completed studies. Objective To characterise, contrast and explain rates of compliance with ontime registration of new studies and posting of results for completed studies on CTG. Design Statistical analysis of publically available data downloaded from the CTG website. Participants US studies registered on CTG since 1 November 1999, the date when the CTG website became operational, through 24 June 2011, the date the data set was downloaded for analysis. Main outcome measures Ontime registration (within 21 days of study start); average delay from study start to registration; proportion of studies posting their results from within the group of studies listed as completed on CTG. Results As of 24 June 2011, CTG contained 54?890 studies registered in the USA. Prior to 2005, an estimated 80% of US studies were not being registered. Among registered studies, only 55.7% registered within the 21-day reporting window. The average delay on CTG was 322 days. Between 28 September 2007 and June 23 2010, 28% of intervention studies at Phase II or beyond posted their study results on CTG, compared with 8.4% for studies without industry funding (RR 4.2, 95% CI 3.7 to 4.8). Factors associated with posting of results included exclusively paediatric studies (adjusted OR (AOR) 2.9, 95% CI 2.1 to 4.0), and later phase clinical trials (relative to Phase II studies, AOR for Phase III was 3.4, 95% CI 2.8 to 4.1; AOR for Phase IV was 6.0, 95% CI 4.8 to 7.6). Conclusions Non-compliance with FDAMA and FDAAA appears to be very common, although compliance is higher for studies sponsored by industry. Further oversight may be required to improve compliance.
机译:背景信息1997年的《食品药物管理局现代化法案》(FDAMA)和2007年的FDA修正案(FDAAA)分别规定了在临床试验网站(CTG)上注册介入性人体研究和发布研究结果的授权。完成的研究。目的表征,对比和解释新研究的按时注册和CTG完整研究的结果发布的依从率。从CTG网站下载的公开可用数据的设计统计分析。参加者自1999年11月1日(即CTG网站启用之日起)至2011年6月24日(即下载数据集进行分析之日)以来在CTG上注册的美国研究。主要结果指标准时登记(学习开始后21天内);从研究开始到注册的平均延迟;在CTG上列出的已完成研究的研究组中发布结果的研究比例。结果截至2011年6月24日,CTG包含54 890项在美国注册的研究。在2005年之前,估计有80%的美国研究尚未注册。在注册研究中,只有55.7%在21天报告期内注册。 CTG的平均延迟为322天。在2007年9月28日至2010年6月23日之间,第二阶段或以后的干预研究中有28%在CTG上发布了其研究结果,而没有行业资助的研究则为8.4%(RR 4.2,95%CI 3.7至4.8)。与结果发布相关的因素包括专门的儿科研究(调整后的OR(AOR)2.9,95%CI 2.1至4.0)和后期临床试验(相对于II期研究,III期AOR为3.4,95%CI 2.8至95%CI 2.8)。 4.1;阶段IV的AOR为6.0,95%CI为4.8至7.6)。结论不遵守FDAMA和FDAAA的情况似乎很普遍,尽管行业赞助的研究的依从性更高。可能需要进一步监督以提高合规性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号