首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Microbiology: An Official Journal of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland >Direct identification of bacteria from BacT/ALERT anaerobic positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS: MALDI Sepsityper kit versus an in-house saponin method for bacterial extraction
【24h】

Direct identification of bacteria from BacT/ALERT anaerobic positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS: MALDI Sepsityper kit versus an in-house saponin method for bacterial extraction

机译:通过MALDI-TOF MS直接鉴定BacT / ALERT厌氧阳性血液培养物中的细菌:MALDI Sepsityper试剂盒与内部皂苷提取细菌的方法

获取原文
       

摘要

In cases of bacteraemia, a rapid species identification of the causal agent directly from positive blood culture broths could assist clinicians in the timely targeting of empirical antimicrobial therapy. For this purpose, we evaluated the direct identification of micro-organisms from BacT/ALERT (bioMérieux) anaerobic positive blood cultures without charcoal using the Microflex matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time of flight MS (Bruker), after bacterial extraction by using two different methods: the MALDI Sepsityper kit (Bruker) and an in-house saponin lysis method. Bruker’s recommended criteria for identification were expanded in this study, with acceptance of the species identification when the first three results with the best matches with the MALDI Biotyper database were identical, whatever the scores were. In total, 107 monobacterial cultures and six polymicrobial cultures from 77 different patients were included in this study. Among monomicrobial cultures, we identified up to the species level 67 and 66 % of bacteria with the MALDI Sepsityper kit and the saponin method, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two extraction methods. The direct species identification was particularly inconclusive for Gram-positive bacteria, as only 58 and 52 % of them were identified to the species level with the MALDI Sepsityper kit and the saponin method, respectively. Results for Gram-negative bacilli were better, with 82.5 and 90 % of correct identification to the species level with the MALDI Sepsityper kit and the saponin method, respectively. No misidentifications were given by the direct procedures when compared with identifications provided by the conventional method. Concerning the six polymicrobial blood cultures, whatever the extraction method used, a correct direct identification was only provided for one of the isolated bacteria on solid medium in all cases. The analysis of the time-to-result demonstrated a reduction in the turnaround time for identification ranging from 1 h 06 min to 24 h 44 min, when performing the blood culture direct identification in comparison with the conventional method, whatever the extraction method.
机译:在菌血症的情况下,直接从阳性血液培养液中快速鉴定出致病菌的种类可以帮助临床医生及时针对经验性抗菌疗法。为此,我们使用细菌提取后的Microflex基质辅助激光解吸/电离(MALDI)飞行时间MS(布鲁克),评估了无木炭的BacT / ALERT(bioMérieux)厌氧阳性血液培养物中的微生物的直接鉴定。通过使用两种不同的方法:MALDI Sepsityper试剂盒(布鲁克公司)和内部皂苷裂解方法。在这项研究中,布鲁克扩展了推荐的鉴定标准,并且无论分数如何,只要与MALDI Biotyper数据库最匹配的前三个结果相同,就可以接受物种鉴定。本研究总共包括来自77位不同患者的107种单细菌培养物和6种多菌种培养物。在单微生物培养物中,我们分别使用MALDI Sepsityper试剂盒和皂苷方法鉴定出高达67%和66%的细菌。两种提取方法之间没有显着差异。对于革兰氏阳性细菌而言,直接物种鉴定尤其不确定,因为分别使用MALDI Sepsityper试剂盒和皂苷方法只能鉴定出58和52%的物种。革兰氏阴性杆菌的结果更好,使用MALDI Sepsityper试剂盒和皂苷方法的正确鉴定率分别为82.5和90%。与常规方法提供的识别结果相比,直接程序没有给出任何错误识别信息。关于六种微生物血液培养物,无论采用哪种提取方法,在所有情况下都仅对固体培养基上分离出的一种细菌提供了正确的直接鉴定。对结果时间的分析表明,与常规方法相比,无论采用哪种提取方法,进行血培养直接鉴定时,鉴定所需的周转时间均从1 h 06分钟减少至24 h 44 min。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号