...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter
【24h】

Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter

机译:社交听力:Twitter上电子烟讨论的内容分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has increased in the United States, leading to active debate in the public health sphere regarding e-cigarette use and regulation. To better understand trends in e-cigarette attitudes and behaviors, public health and communication professionals can turn to the dialogue taking place on popular social media platforms such as Twitter.Objective: The objective of this study was to conduct a content analysis to identify key conversation trends and patterns over time using historical Twitter data.Methods: A 5-category content analysis was conducted on a random sample of tweets chosen from all publicly available tweets sent between May 1, 2013, and April 30, 2014, that matched strategic keywords related to e-cigarettes. Relevant tweets were isolated from the random sample of approximately 10,000 tweets and classified according to sentiment, user description, genre, and theme. Descriptive analyses including univariate and bivariate associations, as well as correlation analyses were performed on all categories in order to identify patterns and trends.Results: The analysis revealed an increase in e-cigarette–related tweets from May 2013 through April 2014, with tweets generally being positive; 71% of the sample tweets were classified as having a positive sentiment. The top two user categories were everyday people (65%) and individuals who are part of the e-cigarette community movement (16%). These two user groups were responsible for a majority of informational (79%) and news tweets (75%), compared to reputable news sources and foundations or organizations, which combined provided 5% of informational tweets and 12% of news tweets. Personal opinion (28%), marketing (21%), and first person e-cigarette use or intent (20%) were the three most common genres of tweets, which tended to have a positive sentiment. Marketing was the most common theme (26%), and policy and government was the second most common theme (20%), with 86% of these tweets coming from everyday people and the e-cigarette community movement combined, compared to 5% of policy and government tweets coming from government, reputable news sources, and foundations or organizations combined.Conclusions: Everyday people and the e-cigarette community are dominant forces across several genres and themes, warranting continued monitoring to understand trends and their implications regarding public opinion, e-cigarette use, and smoking cessation. Analyzing social media trends is a meaningful way to inform public health practitioners of current sentiments regarding e-cigarettes, and this study contributes a replicable methodology.
机译:背景:在美国,使用电子烟(电子烟)的情况有所增加,导致公共卫生领域对电子烟的使用和法规进行了积极的辩论。为了更好地了解电子烟态度和行为的趋势,公共卫生和传播专业人士可以转向在流行的社交媒体平台(例如Twitter)上进行的对话。目的:本研究的目的是进行内容分析,以识别关键对话方法:使用Twitter的历史数据随时间变化趋势和模式。方法:从2013年5月1日至2014年4月30日之间发送的所有公开可用推文中随机选择一条推文样本,进行5类内容分析,并与相关的战略关键词匹配到电子烟。从大约10,000条推文的随机样本中分离出相关推文,并根据情感,用户描述,体裁和主题进行分类。为了确定模式和趋势,对所有类别进行了描述性分析,包括单变量和双变量关联以及相关性分析。结果:分析显示,从2013年5月到2014年4月,与电子烟相关的推文有所增加,总体上推文积极71%的样本推文被归类为具有积极情绪。用户的前两个类别是日常人(65%)和参与电子烟社区运动的个人(16%)。与信誉良好的新闻来源和基金会或组织相比,这两个用户组负责大部分的信息性推文(79%)和新闻推文(75%),二者合计提供了5%的信息推文和12%的新闻推文。个人意见(28%),市场营销(21%)和第一人称电子烟的使用或意图(20%)是三种最常见的推文类型,往往具有积极的情绪。营销是最常见的主题(占26%),政策和政府是第二个最常见的主题(占20%),其中86%的推文来自日常人群和电子烟社区运动,而占5%。来自政府,知名新闻来源以及基金会或组织的政策和政府推文。结论:每天人们和电子烟社区是跨多种流派和主题的主导力量,需要持续监控以了解趋势及其对民意的影响,使用电子烟和戒烟。分析社交媒体趋势是一种有意义的方式,可以使公共卫生从业人员了解有关电子烟的当前情绪,并且本研究为可复制方法提供了帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号