首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Physics/Association of Medical Physicists of India >Estimating Second Malignancy Risk in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy using a Mechanistic Radiobiological Model in Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of Left Breast
【24h】

Estimating Second Malignancy Risk in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy using a Mechanistic Radiobiological Model in Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of Left Breast

机译:使用机械放射生物学模型评估左乳房癌放射治疗中强度调节放疗和容积调节弧光治疗中的第二恶性肿瘤风险

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: The aim of this study is to estimate second cancer risk (SCR) in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using a mechanistic radiobiological model. The model also takes into account patient age at exposure and the gender-specific correction factors of SCR. Materials and Methods: Fifty IMRT and VMAT plans were selected for the study. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation engine was used for dose calculation. Appropriate model parameters were taken from the literature for the mechanistic model to calculate excess absolute risk (EAR), lifetime attributable risk, integral dose and relative risk (RR) for lungs, contralateral breast, heart, and spinal cord. Results: The mean monitor unit (MU) in IMRT and VMAT plans were 751.1 ± 133.3 and 1004.8 ± 180, respectively, for IMRT and VMAT. The mean EAR values with age correction were 44.6 ± 11.9, 11.2 ± 6.4, 5.4 ± 4.0, 1.4 ± 0.5, and 0.3 ± 0.2 for left lung, right lung, contralateral breast, heart, and spinal cord, respectively, for the IMRT treatments and 54.6 ± 20.6, 30.2 ± 12.0, 13.8 ± 8.6, 1.6 ± 0.6, and 0.9 ± 0.5 for the VMAT treatments in units of 10,000 PY. The RR of 6.7% and 9.1%, respectively, for IMRT and VMAT found in our study using computational models is in close comparison with the value reported in a large epidemiological breast cancer study. Conclusions: VMAT plans had a higher risk of developing second malignancy in lung, contralateral breast, heart, and cord compared to IMRT plans. However, the increase in risk was found to be marginal compared to IMRT. Incorporating the age correction factor decreased the risk of contralateral breast SCR. No strong correlation was found between EAR and MU.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是使用机械放射生物学模型评估强度调节放疗(IMRT)和体积调节电弧治疗(VMAT)中的第二种癌症风险(SCR)。该模型还考虑了暴露时的患者年龄和SCR的性别特定校正因子。材料和方法:选择五十项IMRT和VMAT计划进行研究。基于蒙特卡洛的剂量计算引擎用于剂量计算。从有关机械模型的文献中选取适当的模型参数,以计算肺,对侧乳腺,心脏和脊髓的绝对绝对风险(EAR),终生归因风险,总剂量和相对风险(RR)。结果:IMRT和VMAT计划中的IMRT和VMAT计划中的平均监视单元(MU)分别为751.1±133.3和1004.8±180。 IMRT治疗的年龄校正后的平均EAR值分别为左肺,右肺,对侧乳房,心脏和脊髓的44.6±11.9、11.2±6.4、5.4±4.0、1.4±0.5和0.3±0.2对于VMAT处理,以10,000 PY为单位,分别为54.6±20.6、30.2±12.0、13.8±8.6、1.6±0.6和0.9±0.5。使用计算模型在我们的研究中发现的IMRT和VMAT的RR分别为6.7%和9.1%,与大型流行病学乳腺癌研究中报道的值有着密切的比较。结论:与IMRT计划相比,VMAT计划在肺,对侧乳房,心脏和脐带发生第二恶性肿瘤的风险更高。但是,与IMRT相比,发现风险增加很小。纳入年龄校正因子可降低对侧乳房SCR的风险。在EAR和MU之间未发现强相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号