首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Care in the Mediterranean Region
【24h】

Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Care in the Mediterranean Region

机译:医疗保健专业人员对地中海地区2型糖尿病护理的看法

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionThis study aimed to assess the adherence to guidelines by practitioners working in the Mediterranean region and to identify the reasons for non-compliance. MethodsA opportunistic self-administered questionnaire was circulated among members of the Mediterranean Group for the Study of Diabetes (MGSD) and regional diabetic associations. The study was limited to the Mediterranean region; 2841 medical practitioners participated in the study. Intervention involved a self-administered questionnaire enabling demographic and personal details to be correlated to relevant information related to practice and continuing health professional education (CHPE) attitudes, perceptions related to diabetes and healthcare systems in the community, and physicians’ attitudes to healthcare practices and target goals relevant to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The main outcome measure was adherence to evidence-based guidelines. ResultsWhile the majority of respondents (69.9%) reported being confident in managing these patients, and 79.2% reported being aware of the availability of local guidelines; only a fifth opted to manage patients by strictly targeting an HbA1c value below 6.5%, while 3.3% were happy to maintain an HbA1c value of up to 8.0%. These goals appeared to be tempered by fear of eliciting hypoglycaemia in the belief that patients and their families do not have the skills to manage the complication. Endocrinologists/internists preferred more rigid control. ConclusionIt is clear that the promulgation of evidence-based guidelines cannot assume automatic adoption in clinical practice since adoption is tempered by on-the-ground practice circumstances that make the practitioner reluctant to fully endorse and adopt the targets defined by the guidelines. The evidence-based guidelines need to be modified for local or regional circumstances. FundingThis study and the Rapid Service Fee were supported by a financial grant from the Mediterranean Group for the Study of Diabetes which is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Servier.
机译:引言这项研究旨在评估在地中海地区工作的从业人员对准则的遵守情况,并确定违规原因。方法在地中海研究小组(MGSD)的成员和地区糖尿病协会之间分发了机会主义的自我管理问卷。该研究仅限于地中海地区。 2841名医生参加了这项研究。干预措施涉及一份自我管理的调查问卷,该问卷可将人口统计信息和个人详细信息与实践和持续健康专业教育(CHPE)态度,社区中与糖尿病和医疗系统有关的看法以及医师对医疗保健做法和态度的相关信息相关。与2型糖尿病(T2DM)相关的目标。主要结果指标是遵守循证指南。结果大多数受访者(69.9%)表示对这些患者的治疗充满信心,而79.2%的受访者表示了解当地指南的适用性;只有五分之一的人选择严格控制HbA1c值低于6.5%来管理患者,而3.3%的人乐意将HbA1c值维持在8.0%以内。由于担心患者及其家属没有处理并发症的能力,这些目标似乎是由于担心引发低血糖而被缓和的。内分泌学家/实习医生更喜欢严格的控制。结论显然,基于证据的指南的颁布不能在临床实践中假定自动采用,因为采用是受到实际实践环境的限制,这些实践条件使从业者不愿完全认可并采用指南所定义的目标。基于证据的指南需要针对当地或区域情况进行修改。资金这项研究和快速服务费得到了地中海糖尿病研究小组的财政资助,该资助由Servier的无限制教育资助支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号