...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Pancreas >Accuracy of Multi-Detector Computed Tomography, Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-CT, and CA 19-9 Levels in Detecting Recurrent Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
【24h】

Accuracy of Multi-Detector Computed Tomography, Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-CT, and CA 19-9 Levels in Detecting Recurrent Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

机译:多检测器计算机断层扫描,氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描CT和CA 19-9水平在检测胰腺癌复发中的准确性。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Context We compared the accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT(FDG-PET-CT), multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and CA 19-9 levels in detecting pancreatic cancer recurrencein patients with resected CA 19-9 positive pancreatic adenocarcinomas. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 122 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas who underwentsurgical resection of the tumor between January 2002 and December 2011. Twenty-fivepatients had MDCT, FDG-PET-CT and CA 19-9 levels performed no less than sixweeks post-operation andwithin 8 weeks of each other for detection of tumor recurrence. Of these, 20 patientshad high pre-operative CA 19-9 levels that dropped to a normal level postoperativelywhich will be the focus of this study. The sensitivity, specificity, positive andnegative predictive value (PPV, NPV), and accuracy of MDCT, FDG-PET-CT, and CA 19-9in detecting recurrence were compared. Results Operations performed includedpyloric sparing pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=9), pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=7), distalpancreatectomy (n=3) and total pancreatectomy (n=1). Three patients had no recurrence,but local recurrence and distant metastasis were seen in 8 (40%) and 12 (60%) patients,respectively. In our study, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnosticeffectiveness (accuracy) were: 82%, 100%, 100%, 50%, 85% for MDCT; 82%, 100%, 100%,50%, 85% for FDG-PET-CT and 94%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 95%for CA 19-9. The difference in recurrence detection accuracy of the tests was notstatistically significant. A combination of CA 19-9 with MDCT or FDG-PET-CT was 100% accuratein detecting cancer recurrence in our patients. Conclusion Our data suggeststhat CA 19-9 levels can be used reliably to detect recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinomasin patients with CA 19-9-positive primary tumors. Combination of CA 19-9 with MDCT or FDG-PET-CT is potentiallythe most accurate approach in detecting pancreatic cancer recurrence.
机译:背景我们比较了氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描CT(FDG-PET-CT),多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)和CA 19-9水平在切除CA 19-9阳性胰腺腺癌患者中检测胰腺癌复发的准确性。方法我们回顾性评估2002年1月至2011年12月在手术切除下的122例胰腺腺癌患者。25例患者的MDCT,FDG-PET-CT和CA 19-9水平在术后6周及术后8周内进行了检查。互相进行肿瘤复发的检测。其中20例患者术前CA 19-9水平较高,术后CA 19-9水平降至正常水平,这将是本研究的重点。比较了检测CTCT,FDG-PET-CT和CA 19-9的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值(PPV,NPV)和准确性。结果进行的手术包括幽门保留胰十二指肠切除术(n = 9),胰十二指肠切除术(n = 7),远端胰切除术(n = 3)和全胰切除术(n = 1)。 3例均无复发,但分别有8例(40%)和12例(60%)出现局部复发和远处转移。在我们的研究中,MDCT的敏感性,特异性,PPV,NPV和诊断有效性(准确性)分别为:82%,100%,100%,50%,85%;对于FDG-PET-CT为82%,100%,100%,50%,85%,对于CA 19-9为94%,100%,100%,75%,95%。测试的复发检测准确性差异无统计学意义。 CA 19-9与MDCT或FDG-PET-CT的组合在检测我们患者的癌症复发方面准确率为100%。结论我们的数据表明,CA 19-9水平可以可靠地用于检测CA 19-9阳性原发性肿瘤患者的复发性胰腺腺癌。 CA 19-9与MDCT或FDG-PET-CT的组合可能是检测胰腺癌复发的最准确方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号