...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine >Comparison of Alprazolam and Low-dose of Risperidone as an Adjunctive Therapy to Enalapril in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension
【24h】

Comparison of Alprazolam and Low-dose of Risperidone as an Adjunctive Therapy to Enalapril in the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension

机译:阿普唑仑和小剂量利培酮作为依那普利辅助治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of alprazolam and risperidone with placebo as a part of adjunctive therapy to enalapril (asprincipal drug) in the management of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.Methods: Patients attending the cardiology OPD of the Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences (HIMS) diagnosed as mild-to-moderate essential hypertension were enrolled. 30 patients were recruited to the study protocol and were randomised into threegroups i.e., group I: patients on tab. enalapril + tab. placebo (HS); group II: patients on tab. enalapril + tab. alprazolam (0.5 mg HS)and group III: patients on tab. enalapril + tab. risperidone (0.5 mg HS). The following parameters were analysed after a period of 8weeks: (a) BP, (b) adverse drug reactions, (c) QOL measures, (d) patient compliance.Results: A significant drop in systolic bloo d pressure (SBP) was observed in the risperidone and placebo group as compared to thealprazolam group. There was no treatment withdrawal because of adverse drug reactions. There was no significant change inquality of life (QOL) scores after 8 weeks of adjunctive therapy. Adherence to treatment regimen was > 90%. Magnitude of BPreduction among the three treatment groups after 8 weeks of the study period was similar, though a significant drop in SBP wasobserved in the risperidone and placebo group.Conclusion: Adjunctive therapies used in the present study are equally effective as the non-pharmacological lifestyle modificationsin vogue, but the balance is to be maintained between the QOL and the therapy selected
机译:目的:比较阿普唑仑和利培酮与安慰剂作为依那普利(主治药物)辅助治疗在轻度至中度原发性高血压治疗中的疗效。方法:参加喜马拉雅医学研究所心脏病学OPD的患者(HIMS)被诊断为轻度至中度原发性高血压。将30名患者招募到研究方案中,并随机分为三组,即第一组:选项卡上的患者。依那普利+ Tab。安慰剂(HS);第二组:病人。依那普利+ Tab。阿普唑仑(0.5 mg HS)和第三组:病人标签。依那普利+ Tab。利培酮(0.5 mg HS)。经过8周的时间后分析以下参数:(a)BP,(b)药物不良反应,(c)QOL指标,(d)患者依从性。结果:观察到收缩压(SBP)明显下降在利培酮和安慰剂组中与阿普唑仑组比较。由于药物不良反应,没有退出治疗。辅助治疗8周后,生活质量(QOL)得分无明显变化。坚持治疗方案> 90%。尽管在利培酮和安慰剂组中SBP明显下降,但三个治疗组在研究期8周后的BPreduction幅度相似。结论:本研究中使用的辅助疗法与非药物生活方式一样有效进行时尚修改,但要在QOL和所选疗法之间保持平衡

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号