...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Virtual fluoroscopy during transbronchial biopsy for locating ground-glass nodules not visible on X-ray fluoroscopy
【24h】

Virtual fluoroscopy during transbronchial biopsy for locating ground-glass nodules not visible on X-ray fluoroscopy

机译:经支气管活检期间的虚拟透视检查,以定位X射线透视检查看不到的毛玻璃结节

获取原文

摘要

Background: Virtual fluoroscopy (VF) is a novel guided technique that provides ray summation images of target lesions similar to X-ray fluoroscopy. Endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) is a useful modality for imaging ground-glass nodules (GGNs) but is not ideal for GGNs that cannot be detected on X-ray fluoroscopy. We evaluated whether the addition of VF to EBUS-GS improved the diagnostic yield. Methods: Consecutive patients who had undergone diagnostic bronchoscopy for GGNs that were not detected on X-ray fluoroscopy between September 2012 and January 2016 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: a non-VF group [performed using conventional thin-section computed tomography (CT), X-ray fluoroscopy, EBUS-GS, and virtual bronchoscopy for reference], and a VF group (performed using additional VF to non-VF group). We then compared the diagnostic yields between the two groups and performed a multivariate analysis to identify factors associated with an increased diagnostic yield. Results: A total of 74 patients (VF, 35 patients; non-VF, 39 patients) were enrolled and were included in the analysis. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher in the VF group (77.1%) than in the non- VF group (51.2%, P=0.030). There were no clinically significant complications in either group. In the multivariate analysis, a positive bronchus sign (odds ratio, 5.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.36–21.40) and the use of VF (odds ratio, 3.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.16–11.60) were significantly associated with successful bronchoscopic diagnosis. Conclusions: The addition of VF to EBUS-GS helped to identify GGNs that were not visible on X-ray fluoroscopy.
机译:背景技术:虚拟荧光检查(VF)是一种新颖的引导技术,可提供与X射线荧光检查类似的靶病变的射线总和图像。带有引导鞘的支气管内超声(EBUS-GS)是一种用于对毛玻璃结节(GGN)进行成像的有用方式,但对于无法在X射线荧光透视法上检测到的GGN而言并不是理想的选择。我们评估了在EBUS-GS中添加VF是否可以提高诊断率。方法:回顾性分析2012年9月至2016年1月间未接受X线透视检查的GGN诊断性支气管镜检查的连续患者。将患者分为两组:非VF组[使用常规薄层计算机体层摄影(CT),X射线透视,EBUS-GS和虚拟支气管镜进行参考]和VF组(使用其他VF到非VF组)。然后,我们比较了两组之间的诊断率,并进行了多变量分析,以确定与诊断率提高相关的因素。结果:共纳入74例患者(VF,35例;非VF,39例),并纳入分析。 VF组的诊断率(77.1%)显着高于非VF组(51.2%,P = 0.030)。两组均无临床上明显的并发症。在多变量分析中,支气管镜检查成功与支气管正征(比值,5.41; 95%置信区间,1.36–21.40)和使用VF(比值,3.68; 95%置信区间,1.16–11.60)密切相关。诊断。结论:在EBUS-GS中添加VF有助于鉴定在X射线透视检查中不可见的GGN。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号