首页> 外文会议>International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery >Virtual fluoroscopy vs. conventional C-arm guided sacroiliac screw placement - An evaluation of surgical time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose receive in cadaver pelves
【24h】

Virtual fluoroscopy vs. conventional C-arm guided sacroiliac screw placement - An evaluation of surgical time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose receive in cadaver pelves

机译:虚拟荧光透视与常规C臂引导的骶髂螺钉放置 - 在尸体岩石中的外科时间,透明时间和辐射剂量的评估

获取原文

摘要

Objectives/Background: Iliosacral screw fixation is technically demanding, and all authors emphasize the importance of optimizing visualization of the posterior pelvis with ideal fluoroscopic projections to ensure accurate screw placement [1, 4, 5]. Traditionally, this has required the acquisition of large numbers of fluoroscopic images during the surgical procedure, often with the surgeon's dominant hand near the radiating beam of the fluoroscopy unit. Furthermore, the patient's GU system may be exposed to high levels of radiation as protective shielding obscures visualization of the SI joints [2, 3]. Virtual fluoroscopy uses stored fluoroscopic images to provide multi-planar intra-operative navigational guidance, eliminating the need to repeatedly reposition the C-arm and obtain multiple images during the surgical procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine if the virtual fluoroscopy technology decreases the radiation dose received by the both the surgeon and the patient as well as the total fluoroscopy time when compared to the traditional C-arm guided technique. Design/Methods: 12 fresh frozen cadaveric pelves were instrumented with 48 cannulated 6.5mm titanium screws. Screws were placed at the S1 and S2 levels on one side under conventional fluoroscopic guidance; the contralateral side was instrumented with the use of the FluoroNavTM virtual fluoroscopy system. TLD radiation-sensitive badges were placed on the cadavers' umbilicus as well as on the operating surgeon's dominant hand to monitor the radiation dose equivalent received during each procedure. The total duration of fluoroscopy was recorded as was the duration of fluoroscopy for the set-up, the S1 and the S2 screw insertions for both methods. The total surgical time was monitored with digital stop watches as were the set-up and screw insertion times. After both SI joints had been instrumented, anatomic dissection was performed to identify any misdirected screws violating the anterior sacral cortex or the sacral foramen. Results: The virtual fluoroscopy (VF) navigational technique decreased the average duration of fluoroscopy per procedure by more than 50% (93.83 +- 37.40 seconds for C-arm vs. 40.67 +- 16.06 seconds for VF, p value 0.0039). While the set up time was longer for the virtual fluoroscopy system (7:27 +-1:14 min. vs. 2:42 +- 1:24 min. for C-arm), the total surgical time was not found to be significantly prolonged. The superficial/skin level dose equivalent received by the cadaveric pelves was decreased 40% under virtual fluoroscopy guidance (24.5 +-16.40 millirems for VF vs. 39.17 +- 28.51 millirems for C-arm), while the deep dose/organ dose equivalent was decreased 30% (21.50 +- 13.34 millirems for VF vs. 31.67 +- 18.90 millirems for C-arm.) The radiation dose received by the operating surgeon's hand was decreased four fold (0.83 millirems for VF vs. 3.75 millirems for C-arm.) The accuracy was comparable with both techniques, and no screws were found to violate neither the anterior sacral cortex nor the foramen in either group. Conclusions: The virtual fluoroscopy system enables the surgeon to accurately navigate optically sensed surgical instruments throughout the anatomy using pre-acquired coupled images, eliminating the need to repeatedly reposition the C-arm in order to update instrument position. The computer assisted navigational system was found to significantly decrease the duration of fluoroscopy utilization for iliosacral screw fixation as well as the radiation dose received by the patient and the operating surgeon. The system allows excellent visualization of the posterior pelvic ring, and there were no aberrantly placed screws based on anatomic dissection. Finally, while anecdotal experience and previous reports indicate that computer assisted navigational systems increase total surgical time; our finding was that the total surgical time was equal with virtual fluoroscopy when compared to conventional C-arm guided SI screw placeme
机译:目标/背景:骶髂螺钉固定在技术上要求高,并且所有作者强调优化与理想透视突起后部骨盆的可视化,以确保准确的螺钉放置[1,4,5]的重要性。传统上,这需要购置大量的荧光透视图像的手术过程中,常常用X射线透视设备的辐射束附近的外科医生的惯用手。此外,患者的GU系统可以暴露于高剂量辐射作为SI关节[2,3]的防护屏蔽掩盖可视化。虚拟透视使用存储荧光图像,以提供多平面手术中导航向导,无需反复重新定位C型臂和在手术过程期间获得的多个图像。本研究的目的是确定是否比传统的C形臂被引导技术当虚拟透视技术降低由外科医生都和患者以及总透视时间接收的辐射剂量。设计/方法:12个新鲜冰冻尸体pelves用48个空心6.5毫米钛钉仪表。螺杆放置在常规荧光透视引导下一侧的S1和S2电平;对侧用使用FluoroNavTM虚拟荧光透视系统的仪表。 TLD辐射敏感徽章被放置在尸体脐以及对操作的外科医生的优势手来监测剂量当量每个过程期间接收到的辐射。透视的总持续时间被记录为是透视的用于设置,S1和S2的螺钉插入这两种方法的持续时间。总外科时间用数字停止手表监测因为是设置和螺钉插入倍。既骶髂关节已仪器后,进行解剖解剖,以确定侵犯骶前皮层或任何误导螺丝骶后孔。结果:( - 37.40秒与40.67 +为C形臂 - 16.06秒为VF,p值为0.0039 93.83 +)虚拟透视(VF)的导航技术,通过50%以上的降低每过程透视的平均持续时间。而设定了时间较长为虚拟荧光透视系统(7:27 + -1:14分钟对2:42 + - 1:24分钟为C形臂),总手术时间内没有被发现是显著延长。浅表/皮肤水平剂量当量由尸体pelves接收为虚拟透视指导下(24.5 + -16.40毫雷姆为VF与39.17 + - 28.51毫雷姆为C形臂)下降40%,而深剂量/器官剂量当量是减少30%(21.50 + - 13.34毫雷姆为VF与31.67 + - 18.90毫雷姆为C形臂。)的辐射剂量由操作外科医生的手接收被减少4倍(0.83毫雷姆为VF与3.75毫雷姆为C形臂)的准确度是可比较的与这两种技术,并发现无螺丝违反既无骶前皮质也不任一组中的孔。结论:虚拟荧光透视系统使外科医生能够准确导航光学被测手术器械在整个解剖使用预先获得的耦合的图像,无需为了反复重新定位C型臂,以更新器械位置。计算机辅助导航系统被发现显著减少透视利用率的持续时间为骶髂螺钉固定以及由患者和手术医生接收的辐射剂量。该系统允许后部骨盆环的优秀的可视化,并有基于解剖解剖没有异常放置螺钉。最后,虽然根据经验和以往的报告表明,计算机辅助导航系统增加总的手术时间;我们的发现是,当与传统的C形臂被引导SI螺钉placeme总手术时间与虚拟透视等于

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号