首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Does the usage of digital chest drainage systems reduce pleural inflammation and volume of pleural effusion following oncologic pulmonary resection?—A prospective randomized trial
【24h】

Does the usage of digital chest drainage systems reduce pleural inflammation and volume of pleural effusion following oncologic pulmonary resection?—A prospective randomized trial

机译:使用数字胸腔引流系统是否可以减少肿瘤性肺切除术后的胸膜炎症反应和胸腔积液量?-一项前瞻性随机试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Prolonged air leak and high-volume pleural drainage are the most common causes for delays in chest tube removal following lung resection. While digital pleural drainage systems have been successfully used in the management of post-operative air leak, their effect on pleural drainage and inflammation has not been studied before. We hypothesized that digital drainage systems (as compared to traditional analog continuous suction), using intermittent balanced suction, are associated with decreased pleural inflammation and postoperative drainage volumes, thus leading to earlier chest tube removal. Methods: One hundred and three [103] patients were enrolled and randomized to either analog (n=50) or digital (n=53) drainage systems following oncologic lung resection. Chest tubes were removed according to standardized, pre-defined protocol. Inflammatory mediators [interleukin-1B (IL-1B), 6, 8, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)] in pleural fluid and serum were measured and analysed. The primary outcome of interest was the difference in total volume of postoperative fluid drainage. Secondary outcome measures included duration of chest tube in-situ, prolonged air-leak incidence, length of hospital stay and the correlation between pleural effusion formation, degree of inflammation and type of drainage system used. Results: There was no significant difference in total amount of fluid drained or length of hospital stay between the two groups. A trend for shorter chest tube duration was found with the digital system when compared to the analog (P=0.055). Comparison of inflammatory mediator levels revealed no significant differences between digital and analog drainage systems. The incidence of prolonged post-operative air leak was significantly higher when using the analog system (9 versus 2 patients; P=0.025). Lobectomy was associated with longer chest tube duration (P=0.001) and increased fluid drainage when compared to sub-lobar resection (P Conclusions: Use of post-lung resection digital drainage does not appear to decrease pleural fluid formation, but is associated with decreased prolonged air leaks. Total pleural effusion volumes did not differ with the type of drainage system used. These findings support previously established benefits of the digital system in decreasing prolonged air leaks, but the advantages do not appear to extend to decreased pleural fluid formation.
机译:背景:长时间的漏气和大量胸膜引流是导致肺切除术后延迟拔除胸管的最常见原因。尽管数字胸膜引流系统已成功用于术后漏气的处理,但它们对胸膜引流和炎症的影响尚未得到研究。我们假设使用间歇性平衡抽吸的数字引流系统(与传统的模拟连续抽吸相比)与减少胸膜炎症和术后引流量有关,从而导致较早拔除胸管。方法:招募了一百零三名[103]患者,并在肿瘤切除后随机分为模拟(n = 50)或数字(n = 53)引流系统。根据标准化的预定义协议取下胸管。测量并分析胸膜液和血清中的炎性介质[白介素-1B(IL-1B),6、8,肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)]。感兴趣的主要结果是术后引流总体积的差异。次要结果指标包括原位胸管持续时间,延长的漏气发生时间,住院时间以及胸腔积液形成,炎症程度和引流系统类型之间的相关性。结果:两组的总排液量或住院时间没有显着差异。与模拟系统相比,数字系统发现了胸管持续时间较短的趋势(P = 0.055)。比较炎症介质水平,发现数字和模拟引流系统之间无显着差异。使用模拟系统时,术后长时间漏气的发生率明显更高(9例对2例; P = 0.025)。与大叶下切除术相比,肺叶切除术与更长的胸管持续时间(P = 0.001)和引流增加有关(P结论:肺切除术后数字引流的使用似乎并没有减少胸膜积液,但与减少胸膜积液有关胸膜积液总量与所使用的引流系统类型没有差异,这些发现支持了以前数字系统在减少长时间漏气方面的优势,但优势似乎并没有扩展到胸膜积液减少。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号