首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the South Carolina Academy of Science >The Effect of Hordeum vulgare, Rice Hull, and Oak Leaf Litter on the Prevalence of Microcystis
【24h】

The Effect of Hordeum vulgare, Rice Hull, and Oak Leaf Litter on the Prevalence of Microcystis

机译:大麦,稻壳和橡树叶凋落物对微囊藻患病率的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms are becoming more prevalent issues throughout the world, threatening ecosystems, posing risks to human health, and resulting in millions of dollars in economic damage. Conventionally, treatment approaches have been chemical or physical, but these are harmful to aquatic life or inefficient, respectively, which presents the biological approach as a favorable alternative. To assess the effects of low-effort and cost-effective treatments, Hordeum vulgare, rice hull, and oak leaf litter were individually applied to Microcystis cultures and compared to two negative controls (Microcystis alone and cotton on Microcystis) and a positive control (CuSO4). This research was aimed at comparing the capabilities of these treatments on minimizing the size of cyanobacterial blooms, through optical density. It was hypothesized that Hordeum vulgare would be the most effective treatment since barley straw releases phenolic compounds. Separately, observations of the effects of these treatments on Daphnia magna populations were noted in separate cultures without Microcystis. Optical density was taken of the groups with cyanobacteria at 730 nm prior to adding treatments and repeated twice on weekly intervals. After calculating the decrease in OD, an ANOVA at alpha equals 0.05 was used to determine whether there were any significant differences between the means. The ANOVA determined that the values were not significant, as palpha (F(5, 37) = 1.31, p=0.283), showing that none of the treatments had significantly different effects. Thus, the hypothesis that Hordeum vulgare would be the most effective in decreasing Microcystis prevalence was not supported.
机译:蓝藻有害藻华正在全球范围内变得越来越普遍,威胁生态系统,对人类健康构成威胁,并造成数百万美元的经济损失。传统上,处理方法是化学的或物理的,但是分别对水生生物有害或效率低下,这将生物学方法作为一种有利的替代方法。为了评估省力而划算的治疗效果,将大麦,稻壳和橡树叶垫分别应用于微囊藻培养物,并与两个阴性对照(单独的微囊藻和微囊藻上的棉花)和阳性对照(CuSO4)进行比较)。这项研究旨在通过光密度比较这些处理方法在最小化蓝藻水华大小方面的能力。据推测,由于大麦秸秆释放酚类化合物,大麦将是最有效的处理方法。另外,在没有微囊藻的单独培养物中,注意到了对这些处理对大型蚤(Daphnia magna)的影响的观察结果。在添加处理之前,对具有蓝细菌的组在730 nm处进行光密度测定,并每周重复两次。在计算出OD的降低后,使用α等于0.05的方差分析确定平均值之间是否存在显着差异。方差分析确定该值不显着,因为p>α(F(5,37)= 1.31,p = 0.283),表明没有一种疗法具有明显不同的作用。因此,关于大麦将最有效地降低微囊藻患病率的假设不成立。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号