...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Intermittent chest tube clamping may shorten chest tube drainage and postoperative hospital stay after lung cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis
【24h】

Intermittent chest tube clamping may shorten chest tube drainage and postoperative hospital stay after lung cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis

机译:肺癌手术后间歇性胸管夹紧可缩短胸管引流和术后住院时间:倾向评分匹配分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Postoperative pleural drainage markedly influences the length of hospital stay and the financial costs of medical care. The safety of chest tube clamping before removal has been documented. This study aims to determine if intermittent chest tube clamping shortens the duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay after lung cancer surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 285 consecutive patients with operable lung cancer treated using lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The chest tube management protocol in our institution was changed in January 2014, and thus, 222 patients (clamping group) were managed with intermittent chest tube clamping, while 63 patients (control group) were managed with a traditional protocol. Propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio was applied to balance variables potentially affecting the duration of chest tube drainage. Analyses were performed to compare drainage duration and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups in the matched cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to predict the factors associated with chest tube drainage duration. Results: The rates of thoracocentesis after chest tube removal were similar between the clamping and control groups in the whole cohort (0.5% vs . 1.6%, P=0.386). The rates of pyrexia were also comparable in the two groups (2.3% vs . 3.2%, P=0.685). After propensity score matching, 61 cases remained in each group. Both chest tube drainage duration (3.9 vs . 4.8 days, P=0.001) and postoperative stay (5.7 vs . 6.4 days, P=0.025) were significantly shorter in the clamping group than in the control group. Factors significantly associated with shorter chest tube drainage duration were female sex, chest tube clamping, left lobectomy, and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) (P Conclusions: Intermittent postoperative chest tube clamping may decrease the duration of chest tube drainage and postoperative hospital stay while maintaining patient safety.
机译:背景:术后胸膜引流明显影响住院时间和医疗费用。已经记录了拆卸前胸管夹紧的安全性。这项研究旨在确定间歇性胸管夹持术是否能缩短肺癌手术后胸腔引流和住院时间。方法:我们回顾性分析了285例连续的可手术肺癌患者,这些患者通过肺叶切除术和系统纵隔淋巴结清扫术治疗。我们机构的胸管管理规程于2014年1月进行了更改,因此,采用间歇方案对222例患者(钳组)进行了间歇性胸管钳制,而对63例患者(对照组)进行了传统方案。以1:1比例进行的倾向得分匹配应用于平衡变量,这些变量可能会影响胸管引流的持续时间。进行分析以比较匹配队列中两组之间的引流时间和术后住院时间。进行多因素logistic回归分析以预测与胸管引流持续时间相关的因素。结果:在整个队列中,夹紧组和对照组的胸腔穿刺术后胸腔穿刺率相似(0.5%vs. 1.6%,P = 0.386)。两组的发热率也相当(2.3%vs. 3.2%,P = 0.685)。倾向评分匹配后,每组剩余61例。夹紧组的胸管引流时间(3.9 vs. 4.8天,P = 0.001)和术后停留时间(5.7 vs. 6.4天,P = 0.025)均明显短于对照组。与缩短胸腔引流时间显着相关的因素是女性,胸腔管夹持,左肺叶切除术和电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)(P结论:术后断断续续的胸腔管夹持可能会缩短胸腔引流时间和术后住院时间同时保持患者安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号