...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Translational Medicine >Performance of a multianalyte test as an aid for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women
【24h】

Performance of a multianalyte test as an aid for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women

机译:进行多分析物测试以帮助有症状女性诊断卵巢癌

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Concomitant with the development of in vitro diagnostic multivariate index assays (IVDMIAs) to improve the diagnostic efficiency of ovarian cancer detection is the need to identify appropriate biostatistical approaches to assess improvements in risk predication. In this study, we assessed the utility of three different approaches for comparing diagnostic efficiency of an ovarian cancer multivariate assay in a retrospective case - control phase 2 biomarker trial. The control cohort included both disease-free women and women with benign gynecological conditions to more accurately reflect the target population of symptomatic women. Methods The study cohort comprised plasma samples from 244 healthy controls, 223 women with benign gynecological conditions, 53 borderline ovarian cancer cases and 222 women with malignant epithelial ovarian cancer. A multivariate classification model was developed that incorporated plasma concentrations of CA125, C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid-A (SAA), interleukin-6 (IL6) and interleukin-8 (IL8) that were measured using in vitro diagnostics assays on medical device approved clinical analysers. The posterior probability values derived from the implemented algorithm were used for comparisons of the diagnostic performance between the multianalyte panel and CA125 using multiple methods; area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curve, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Results Each of the biomarkers displayed significantly elevated plasma concentrations in malignant ovarian cancer patients compared with either benign or control subjects. For the discrimination of borderline and malignant ovarian cancer from control and benign subjects, the multivariate classification model showed a significantly greater AUC than that for CA125 alone (88.4% versus 84.3%, respectively, p Conclusions This study confirms in an independent sample set that a blood-based multianalyte assay has significant advantages over CA125 for distinguishing symptomatic women with borderline and malignant ovarian cancer from controls or those with benign disease.
机译:背景技术随着体外诊断多变量指数测定法(IVDMIA)的发展以提高卵巢癌检测的诊断效率,需要确定适当的生物统计学方法来评估风险预测的改善。在这项研究中,我们评估了三种不同方法在回顾性病例-对照2期生物标志物试验中比较卵巢癌多元分析的诊断效率的效用。对照组包括无病妇女和妇科良性妇女,以更准确地反映有症状妇女的目标人群。方法该研究队列包括来自244名健康对照者,223名妇科良性疾病妇女,53名交界性卵巢癌病例和222名恶性上皮性卵巢癌妇女的血浆样本。建立了多变量分类模型,该模型合并了使用体外诊断测定法测量的CA125,C反应蛋白(CRP),血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA),白细胞介素6(IL6)和白细胞介素8(IL8)的血浆浓度。在医疗设备认可的临床分析仪上。从实现的算法得出的后验概率值用于通过多种方法比较多分析物面板和CA125的诊断性能。接收器工作特性曲线的曲线下面积(AUC),综合分辨力改善(IDI)和净重分类改善(NRI)。结果与良性或对照组相比,每个生物标记物在恶性卵巢癌患者中均显示血浆浓度显着升高。为了从对照和良性受试者中区分出边缘性和恶性卵巢癌,多变量分类模型显示出的AUC明显高于单独使用CA125的AUC(分别为88.4%和84.3%,p)结论本研究在独立的样本集中证实了与CA125相比,基于血液的多分析物测定法具有显着的优势,可将有边界和恶性卵巢癌的有症状女性与对照组或良性疾病的女性区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号