...
首页> 外文期刊>JSLS : >Effect of a Disposable Automated Suturing Device on Cost and Operating Room Time in Benign Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Procedures
【24h】

Effect of a Disposable Automated Suturing Device on Cost and Operating Room Time in Benign Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Procedures

机译:一次性自动缝合装置对良性全腹腔镜子宫切除术的费用和手术室时间的影响

获取原文

摘要

Background and Objectives: To determine the effect of a disposable automated laparoscopic suturing device, the Endo Stitch (ES) (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA), on hospital cost and surgical time in patients undergoing a benign total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure compared with the use of the da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) or traditional laparoscopic suturing technique. Methods: The Premier Perspective Database (Premier, Charlotte, NC, USA) was used to identify all inpatient hospital discharges with the primary procedure of a total laparoscopic hysterectomy ( International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 68.41) for benign conditions between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2011. Patients were further categorized into 3 groups: (1) those for whom the ES was used during the laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure, (2) those for whom robotic assistance (RA) was used, and (3) those for whom neither ES nor RA (NER) was used. Multivariate analysis was performed to examine the association among the ES, RA, and NER groups with respect to hospital cost, length of stay, and surgery time. The multivariate analysis controlled for the patient's age, race, severity of illness, and comorbid conditions, as well as hospital characteristics, such as bed size, region, and teaching status. Results: A total of 9308 patients undergoing an inpatient total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2011, were eligible for the study. The ES was used in 974 of the patients (10%), RA was used in 3971 (43%), and neither technique was used in 4363 (47%). After adjusting for confounding variables, the mean hospital cost was $1769 ( P = .0332) lower, with a 42-minute ( P < .001) surgery time savings, for the ES group compared with the RA group. The mean hospitalization cost for the ES group was also $634 ( P < .0879) less expensive, with a 21-minute ( P = .0131) surgery time savings, compared with the NER group. Conclusion: Use of a disposable automated laparoscopic suturing device, the ES, is significantly more cost-effective than the use of the da Vinci surgical system or traditional laparoscopic suturing techniques for the performance of a total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure for benign conditions.
机译:背景与目的:为了确定一次性良性自动腹腔镜缝合装置(Endo Stitch(ES))(Covidien,Mansfield,MA,美国)对进行良性全腹腔镜子宫切除术的患者的住院费用和手术时间的影响。使用达芬奇手术系统(美国加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔的Intuitive Surgical外科手术系统)或传统的腹腔镜缝合技术。方法:使用Premier Perspective Database(Premier,美国北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市)通过全腹腔镜子宫全切除术(国际疾病分类,第九次修订,临床修改代码68.41)来确定所有住院患者的出院良性情况。 2009年1月1日和2011年6月30日。患者进一步分为3组:(1)在腹腔镜子宫切除术中使用ES的患者;(2)使用机器人辅助(RA)的患者;以及(3)既未使用ES也不使用RA(NER)的用户。进行多变量分析以检查ES,RA和NER组之间在医院费用,住院时间和手术时间方面的关联。多元分析控制了患者的年龄,种族,疾病的严重程度和合并症,以及医院的特征,例如床位,区域和教学状况。结果:在2009年1月1日至2011年6月30日之间接受住院腹腔镜全子宫切除术的9308例患者符合研究条件。在974例患者中使用了ES(10%),在3971例患者中使用了RA(43%),在4363例患者中没有使用任何技术(47%)。调整混杂变量后,与RA组相比,ES组的平均住院费用降低了$ 1769(P = .0332),节省了42分钟(P <.001)的手术时间。与NER组相比,ES组的平均住院费用也便宜了634美元(P <.0879),节省了21分钟(P = .0131)的手术时间。结论:使用一次性自动腹腔镜缝合设备ES比使用达芬奇手术系统或传统腹腔镜缝合技术在良性条件下进行全腹腔镜子宫切除术的成本效益要高得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号