...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science >The long empty canyon: A study of the oldew legal problems of the Nile basin
【24h】

The long empty canyon: A study of the oldew legal problems of the Nile basin

机译:空旷的长峡谷:尼罗河流域的新旧法律问题研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Nile River Basin witnesses a long history of tension and negotiation among riparian states. There are legal frameworks govern the Nile Basin. Firstly, the private legal framework reflected in legal history on the Nile. The most legal active period among Nile Basin states was the period between 1890th and 1930th. The legal solutions to the Nile Basin problems came to an end with the end of the colonization in Africa, especially the Nile riparian states. During this period, the tension among liberal states took a different shape. Harmon and Nyerere doctrine were introduced among the riparian states. This led to the refutation of most of the private legal framework from most of the independent states. Thus, riparian states started to explore new legal ground to regulate their relationship. On the other hand, the public legal framework represented in the work of the International Law Association, which started with Helsinki rules in 1966, and the 1997 Convention. Many scholars argue that the legal solution is the best one for the Nile question, based on the previous frameworks. However, this note argued that the international legal framework governing the international rivers generally and the Nile specifically cannot offer a solution to the disputes over the water of the Nile. This note discusses both the legal frameworks of the Nile on one hand. On the other hand, it highlights the points of indeterminacy of both frameworks solve the Nile dilemma. It argues that the solutions of the present and future disputes through legal tools are not enough. This note goes beyond the most proposed recommendation to form a comprehensive treaty as the solution to the riparian problems. It asserts that the law is not a tool to end the states tension, rather than it is a tool to persevere good faith prevent future dispute. A main role of the extra legal solutions must be played. It based its argument on substantive formulate dilemma in the previous frameworks.
机译:尼罗河流域见证了沿河国家之间长期的紧张和谈判历史。尼罗河流域有法律框架。首先,私人法律框架反映了尼罗河的法律历史。在尼罗河流域各州中,最活跃的时期是1890年至1930年之间的时期。随着非洲特别是尼罗河沿岸国家的殖民化的结束,对尼罗河流域问题的法律解决也告一段落。在此期间,自由主义国家之间的紧张局势有所不同。在河岸国家之间引入了哈蒙和尼雷尔主义。这导致了大多数独立国家对大多数私人法律框架的驳斥。因此,河岸国家开始探索新的法律基础来规范其关系。另一方面,国际法协会的工作代表了公共法律框架,该组织始于1966年的赫尔辛基规则和1997年的《公约》。许多学者认为,基于先前的框架,法律解决方案是尼罗河问题的最佳解决方案。但是,该说明认为,管辖整个国际河流和尼罗河的国际法律框架无法为尼罗河水事争端提供解决方案。本说明一方面讨论了尼罗河的两个法律框架。另一方面,它强调了两个框架的不确定性点解决了尼罗河的困境。它认为通过法律工具解决当前和将来的争端还不够。该说明超出了提出最全面建议的建议,该建议形成了一项解决河岸问题的全面条约。它断言该法律不是消除国家紧张局势的工具,而是坚持不懈的真诚防止未来争端的工具。额外法律解决方案的主要作用必须发挥。它的论点基于先前框架中的实质性制定困境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号