首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences >Comparing economic efficiency of wheat productivity in different cropping systems of Sindh Province, Pakistan
【24h】

Comparing economic efficiency of wheat productivity in different cropping systems of Sindh Province, Pakistan

机译:巴基斯坦信德省不同种植方式下小麦生产力的经济效率比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The data for this empirical study were collected from three major cropping systems of Sindh province, and a total of 240 farmers were selected by simple random sampling technique. Cobb-Douglas production function was applied to analyze the data. Results show that in mixed cropping zone wheat yield increased with increasing ploughing, seed and plant protection. The dominant factors behind yield increase in the cotton-wheat cropping zone were ploughing, seed, fertilizer, and irrigation. Wheat yield in the Rice-wheat zone increased linearly with increasing ploughing, seed and fertilizer as well as plant protection measures. Further the results show that salinity and water logging are the driving threats leading to high water table in most regions of upper Sindh. Due to poor land management and improper irrigation strategies, the coefficient of irrigation shows negative value. Contrarily, lower Sindh needs canal irrigation water (i.e. Mixed and cotton-wheat zone), because most of the areas have unfit ground water for irrigation, thus increasing the soil erosion and salinity in lower Sindh. Furthermore, the cost of production estimated in cotton-wheat zone’s grower spends more USD$841/ha as compared to rice-wheat zone’s grower and Mixed cropping zone’s grower spend USD$827/ha and USD$780/ha. The growers of the whole Sindh spend USD$816/ha. In case of gross income cotton-wheat zone’s grower received higher than 1287, followed by the growers of mixed cropping zone and rice-wheat zone received USD$1248/ha and USD$1132/ha due to high cost of production. The overall Sindh growers received USD$1222/ha. In the case of net return grower of mixed cropping zones received higher USD$481/ha, compared to cotton-wheat zone’s and rice-wheat zone’s grower received USD$451/ha and USD$308/ha, respectively. The growers of the whole Sindh province received USD$413/ha net return from wheat crop. The production of wheat is lower as compared to cost. Therefore, net income of per acre and the production cost of per acre reduce with farm size, so increasing the use of inputs should assure the quantity and quality by the approach of growers.
机译:该实证研究的数据是从信德省的三个主要种植系统中收集的,通过简单的随机抽样技术选出了240名农民。应用Cobb-Douglas生产函数来分析数据。结果表明,在混合种植区,小麦产量随着耕作,种子和植物保护的增加而增加。棉花-小麦种植区单产增加的主要因素是耕作,种子,肥料和灌溉。稻麦地带的小麦产量随着耕作,种子和肥料以及植物保护措施的增加而线性增加。进一步的结果表明,盐度和涝渍是导致信德河上游大部分地区地下水位高的驱动因素。由于土地管理不善和灌溉策略不当,灌溉系数显示为负值。相反,信德河下游地区需要渠道灌溉用水(即混合棉田和棉花小麦区),因为大多数地区的灌溉地下水不足,从而加剧了信德河下游地区的土壤侵蚀和盐碱化。此外,与小麦/小麦种植区的种植者相比,棉/麦种植区的生产成本估计多花费841美元/公顷,而混合种植区的种植者则花费827美元/公顷和780美元/公顷。整个信德省的种植者每公顷花费816美元。以总收入为例,棉花小麦种植区的种植者获得的收益高于1287,其次是混合种植区和水稻小麦种植区的种植者获得了1248美元/公顷和1132美元/公顷的高生产成本。信德省的整体种植者获得了1222美元/公顷的收益。就净收益而言,混合种植区的种植者获得的收益为每公顷481美元,相比之下,棉田和水稻种植区的种植者获得的收益分别为451美元/公顷和308美元/公顷。整个信德省的种植者从小麦收成中获得了413美元/公顷的净回报。与成本相比,小麦的产量较低。因此,每英亩的净收入和每英亩的生产成本随农场规模而降低,因此增加投入的使用应通过种植者的方式来保证数量和质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号