...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Saudi Heart Association >The validity of a global tissue Doppler index in estimating left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with coronary artery disease
【24h】

The validity of a global tissue Doppler index in estimating left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with coronary artery disease

机译:整体组织多普勒指数在冠心病患者左​​心室舒张末期压力估算中的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is an important parameter in cardiac patients. There are few data on adding tissue Doppler derived mitral annular peak systolic velocity (S′) wave to the ratio of early mitral inflow to mitral annular velocity (E/E′) for the estimation of left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction. Objectives To assess the validity of E/(E′? ~ S′) in estimating LVEDP in patients with CAD and intermediate E/E′. Methods Sixty-five subjects underwent echocardiography and TDI of the mitral annulus in less than 30 min of cardiac catheterization. Echocardiographic variables including E/E′ and E/(E′? ~ S′) were compared to invasively measured LVEDP. Results Based on coronary angriography, 49 subjects showed significant CAD (group I) while 16 subjects showed no evidence of CAD (control group). The E/E′ and the E/(E′X S′) were significantly higher in CAD patients than in the control group ( P 0.001). In patients with intermediate E/E′, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the E/(Ex S′) and LVEDP ( r = 0.785, P 0.0001) while the E/E′ showed no significant correlation with the LVEDP in this subset of patients ( r = 0.274, P 0.05). ROC analysis yielded an optimal E/(E′? ~ S′) cutoff value of 1.43 for prediction of LVEDP 12 mmHg with a sensitivity of 90.9%, a specificity of 57.1%, a positive predictive value of 76.9% and a negative predictive value of 80.0% (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.71–1.00, P 0.05). The E/E’ ROC cutoff value of 12.2 predicted LVEDP 12 mmHg with a sensitivity of 72.7%, a specificity of 28.6%, a positive predictive value of 61.5% and a negative predictive value of 40.0% (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–0.93, P 0.05). Conclusions E/(E′? ~ S′) correlates well with LVEDP and can be used as a simple andaccurate estimate ofLVEDP in coronary artery disease patients with intermediate E/E′.
机译:背景技术左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)是心脏病患者的重要参数。关于将组织多普勒推导的二尖瓣环收缩峰值速度(S')波与二尖瓣早期流入血流与二尖瓣环速度之比(E / E')相加以估算患者左室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)的数据很少保留左室射血分数。目的评估E /(E'?〜S')在评估CAD和中度E / E'患者LVEDP中的有效性。方法65名受试者在不到30分钟的心脏导管插入过程中接受了超声心动图检查和二尖瓣环的TDI检查。超声心动图变量包括E / E'和E /(E'?〜S')与有创测量的LVEDP进行了比较。结果基于冠状动脉造影,49名受试者显示出明显的CAD(I组),而16名受试者显示没有CAD的证据(对照组)。 CAD患者的E / E'和E /(E'X S')明显高于对照组(P <0.001)。在中度E / E'患者中,E /(Ex S')与LVEDP之间存在极显着的正相关(r = 0.785,P <0.0001),而E / E'与LVEDP之间没有显着相关。这部分患者(r = 0.274,P> 0.05)。 ROC分析得出LVEDP> 12 mmHg的最佳E /(E'?〜S')临界值1.43,灵敏度为90.9%,特异性为57.1%,阳性预测值为76.9%,阴性预测为阴性值80.0%(AUC 0.88,95%CI 0.71–1.00,P <0.05)。 E / E'ROC临界值为12.2预测的LVEDP> 12 mmHg,灵敏度为72.7%,特异性为28.6%,阳性预测值为61.5%,阴性预测值为40.0%(AUC 0.68,95%CI 0.44–0.93,P> 0.05)。结论E /(E'?〜S')与LVEDP相关性良好,可作为中度E / E'冠心病患者的LVEDP的简单而准确的估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号